Problems after ST165 brake upgrade

Discussion and technical advice for 84-89 AW10 & AW11 MR2. 3A-LU, 4A-GE, 4A-GZE.

Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members

Post Reply
BIGBOBO
Posts: 531
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 1:05 am
Location: Belgium

Problems after ST165 brake upgrade

Post by BIGBOBO »

I just installed a set of ST165 front callipers on my MK1a but ran into two problems:

The disc isn't centered at all, it's one or two mm from the inner brake pad, and 7 or 8 from the other. Do I need a need a spacer between the disc? (I upgraded to the mk1b disc)

The brake lines are to short to connect properly to the callipers, I can connect them but then I have to stretch them a bit and they probably wont last long. If I dont clamp them to the strut there's no problem, it's the part between the clamp and the calliper that's too short. Do I need other brake lines?
boondougal
Posts: 520
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 9:48 am
Location: Shavington (near Crewe)

Re: Problems after ST165 brake upgrade

Post by boondougal »

Any pics?

If the distance between the calliper and the clamp is too short have you got the callipers on the right side ( e.g nipple up or nipple down
)
BIGBOBO
Posts: 531
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 1:05 am
Location: Belgium

Re: Problems after ST165 brake upgrade

Post by BIGBOBO »

No pics yet but the bleed nipple is on the top of the calliper.
stenky
Posts: 356
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2011 9:04 pm
Location: Slovakia

Re: Problems after ST165 brake upgrade

Post by stenky »

The closest rotors to what you need are ST165 celica fronts or SV21-25 camry fronts.
I went with the camry ones as they are +-0.1mm the same height as MK1b fronts. I didn't account for pad carrier thickness increase though so that's maybe why ST165 rotors might be the best fit (they sit 1.5mm closer to outer pad). So not only would 25mm rotor make it more like 1-2mm space in the inner side, but outer would be more like 4-5mm. With ST165 it could be 2.5-3.5mm inner, 2.5-3.5mm outer right? Looks like i'll need 3mm aluminium spacers (they can't be made any thinner; maybe laser/water jet cut from sheet ali) + 1.5mm shim between caliper carrier and hub :) My installation however is still a work in progress so I have many surprises ahead I guess.


Code: Select all

	                Dia Thick Height Hub Hat ID Hat OD PCD Holes
AW11 MR2	       258	22	42,1	54	131	141	100	4
Camry SV21-25	 255	25	42	  54	131	141	100	5
Celica ST165	 255	25	40,5	54	131	141	100	5

-Height means the dimension between inner rotor friction surface (facing the inner pad) and inner hat surface (where it touches the wheel hub); so it doesn't take the hat's thickness into account
-Source: Brembo diagrams


EDIT: A little footnote. I haven't found brembo diagram for mk1b so i have nicked mk1a dimensions thinking they are the same with different diameter and thickness only. If not, all I have just written is a lie!
Image
SuperRedMR2
Posts: 5494
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 8:40 pm
Location: Wickford, Essex

Re: Problems after ST165 brake upgrade

Post by SuperRedMR2 »

That is very odd as I am running ST165 calipers with standard mk1b discs with no issues what so ever...
PW@Woodsport
Posts: 7642
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 6:40 pm
Location: durham
Contact:

Re: Problems after ST165 brake upgrade

Post by PW@Woodsport »

Indeed, i invented this mod and have never come across this, it's usually all plug and play with Mk1B discs and hubs.

This leads me to believe the hub itself has a slightly different offset between a Mk1A and B, it's the only explanation i can think of.
Image
BIGBOBO
Posts: 531
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 1:05 am
Location: Belgium

Re: Problems after ST165 brake upgrade

Post by BIGBOBO »

I don't have time to work on the car this weekend but I'll try to take some pictures.

The discs I used were not new (but still good) so I'll measure them to see if they are genuine mk1b discs.

My brake lines aren't toyota originals anymore but I do have them in the basement somewhere, I'll compare them to see if the originals are longer.
BIGBOBO
Posts: 531
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 1:05 am
Location: Belgium

Re: Problems after ST165 brake upgrade

Post by BIGBOBO »

So yeah apparently I installed the brake lines wrong, if you do it correctly they fit properly.

There's still the 3mm offset problem but this is normal it seems. Lot's of threads on mr2oc about it. Either shave 3mm of the carrier bracket or get a 3mm shim behind the disc.
Keri-WMS
Posts: 498
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 11:17 am
Location: WMS Brakes - Bexhill, S.E. UK
Contact:

Re: Problems after ST165 brake upgrade

Post by Keri-WMS »

PW@Woodsport wrote:This leads me to believe the hub itself has a slightly different offset between a Mk1A and B, it's the only explanation i can think of.


Hope not! Never heard of this myself but you never know.

New wheel bearings fitted by any chance?
BIGBOBO
Posts: 531
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 1:05 am
Location: Belgium

Re: Problems after ST165 brake upgrade

Post by BIGBOBO »

You can see the uncentered disc in this picture:

Image
stenky
Posts: 356
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2011 9:04 pm
Location: Slovakia

Re: Problems after ST165 brake upgrade

Post by stenky »

how thick spacers do you need then?
Image
Post Reply

Return to “MR2 MK1 1984-1989 NA & SC”