MR2 Turbo VS Honda Integra Type R???

Tales of driving experiences you have had.


Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members

Post Reply

This post is:

Stupid
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 0

RobCrezz
Posts: 1509
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 10:16 am
Location: Essex

Re: MR2 Turbo VS Honda Integra Type R???

Post by RobCrezz »

Lauren wrote:
Geoff Munt wrote:
Didn't peg you as that ignorant Lauren. It may have leaf springs but it's also got double wishbones front & rear (in aluminium), magnetic damping control (which also adjusts squat and dive automatically) plus other goodies like composite brakes.

Hardly 200-year old technology now is it? [-(


Has it really got double wishbones? I stand corrected. I'm just wondering how that would work with leaf springs. What a weird setup.

Sorry as you've probably guessed i've never been a fan of american cars.


It doesnt use leaf springs in the traditional sense. It uses independent unequal length double wishbones with transverse fiberglass mono-leaf spring mounted to allow for anti-roll effect.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corvette_leaf_springs

You shouldnt knock it just because it uses something relitivly low tech. Look at the LS range of V8 engines. They may be high capacity but they are very lightweight (comparable to alot of 4cyl engines in weight) for the power they produce and very efficient too.
User avatar
Lauren
IMOC Committee
Posts: 38632
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 5:37 pm
Location: Greater Manchester
Contact:

Re: MR2 Turbo VS Honda Integra Type R???

Post by Lauren »

RobCrezz wrote:
It doesnt use leaf springs in the traditional sense. It uses independent unequal length double wishbones with transverse fiberglass mono-leaf spring mounted to allow for anti-roll effect.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corvette_leaf_springs

You shouldnt knock it just because it uses something relitivly low tech. Look at the LS range of V8 engines. They may be high capacity but they are very lightweight (comparable to alot of 4cyl engines in weight) for the power they produce and very efficient too.


Thanks for that very interesting. :+: I didn't actually realise that it was being used in this way, so all news to me, you learn something every day etc.

Must say though i'm still completely underhwelmed by Merkin 2valve V8 engines. I was at a wedding at the weekend a friend of mine has an F355, (he brought it up, hadn't seen it till now) now that sounds like a proper engine to me, tuneful in a way that a merkin engine could never be.

So for me a V8 needs to be Italian or at least European (ie BMW M3 etc).
2020 GR Yaris - Circuit Pack :lover:
johnp
Posts: 2146
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 4:06 pm
Location: Chesterfield

Re: MR2 Turbo VS Honda Integra Type R???

Post by johnp »

Lauren wrote:
RobCrezz wrote:
It doesnt use leaf springs in the traditional sense. It uses independent unequal length double wishbones with transverse fiberglass mono-leaf spring mounted to allow for anti-roll effect.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corvette_leaf_springs

You shouldnt knock it just because it uses something relitivly low tech. Look at the LS range of V8 engines. They may be high capacity but they are very lightweight (comparable to alot of 4cyl engines in weight) for the power they produce and very efficient too.


Thanks for that very interesting. :+: I didn't actually realise that it was being used in this way, so all news to me, you learn something every day etc.

Must say though i'm still completely underhwelmed by Merkin 2valve V8 engines. I was at a wedding at the weekend a friend of mine has an F355, (he brought it up, hadn't seen it till now) now that sounds like a proper engine to me, tuneful in a way that a merkin engine could never be.

So for me a V8 needs to be Italian or at least European (ie BMW M3 etc).


What about the Rover(ex Buick,of course) in TVR's... pre cat 4.3 or HC 5k litre--340hp...standard they sound good,with the right exhaust system they sound fantastic. 8).
mattcambs
Posts: 2308
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 9:59 pm
Location: Saffron Walden, Essex

Re: MR2 Turbo VS Honda Integra Type R???

Post by mattcambs »

What do you mean by Merkin, Lauren?
BarronMR
Posts: 367
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2005 10:00 pm
Location: Brighouse, West Yorkshire.

Re: MR2 Turbo VS Honda Integra Type R???

Post by BarronMR »

mattcambs wrote:What do you mean by Merkin, Lauren?


American, I think. :)

As for v8's, I'd like a 1uz. Toyota reliability, prices and running costs with a nice soundtrack. I've been looking at v8 soarer's with a view to flogging the mk2 v6 and getting one of these beasts.

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=Ba8sT2BQ4uc

and here's one in an ae86 :whistle:

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=CSmllpDQ8 ... re=related
mattcambs
Posts: 2308
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 9:59 pm
Location: Saffron Walden, Essex

Re: MR2 Turbo VS Honda Integra Type R???

Post by mattcambs »

BarronMR wrote:
mattcambs wrote:What do you mean by Merkin, Lauren?


American, I think. :)



Doh! ](*,) :oops: :lol:

Anyway the v8 in the Corvette is an absolute peach apparently
User avatar
Lauren
IMOC Committee
Posts: 38632
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 5:37 pm
Location: Greater Manchester
Contact:

Re: MR2 Turbo VS Honda Integra Type R???

Post by Lauren »

johnp wrote:
What about the Rover(ex Buick,of course) in TVR's... pre cat 4.3 or HC 5k litre--340hp...standard they sound good,with the right exhaust system they sound fantastic. 8).


Hence why I said European. :+:

And Matt, Merkin=American.... just a phonetic interpretation.
2020 GR Yaris - Circuit Pack :lover:
GeoffC320
Posts: 2776
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 3:32 pm
Location: Caterham

Re: MR2 Turbo VS Honda Integra Type R???

Post by GeoffC320 »

Lauren wrote:
johnp wrote:
What about the Rover(ex Buick,of course) in TVR's... pre cat 4.3 or HC 5k litre--340hp...standard they sound good,with the right exhaust system they sound fantastic. 8).


Hence why I said European. :+:

And Matt, Merkin=American.... just a phonetic interpretation.


Buick, of course, being a well-known European brand...not. #-o
User avatar
Lauren
IMOC Committee
Posts: 38632
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 5:37 pm
Location: Greater Manchester
Contact:

Re: MR2 Turbo VS Honda Integra Type R???

Post by Lauren »

Geoff Munt wrote:
Buick, of course, being a well-known European brand...not. #-o


Meh.
2020 GR Yaris - Circuit Pack :lover:
mattcambs
Posts: 2308
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 9:59 pm
Location: Saffron Walden, Essex

Re: MR2 Turbo VS Honda Integra Type R???

Post by mattcambs »

Lauren wrote:

And Matt, Merkin=my pubic wig.


TMI :shock:





:wink:
johnp
Posts: 2146
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 4:06 pm
Location: Chesterfield

Re: MR2 Turbo VS Honda Integra Type R???

Post by johnp »

Referring to the Honda Integra side of this discussion,there is another Honda...more refined and comfortable than a Teg,200hp v-tec engine with more torque,handling excellent for a fwd machine.
However it's mostly forgotten now,considered very uncool and fairly rare, so hard to find a good one.
THE HONDA PRELUDE 2.2 V-TEC MONTEGI.
This looks a good low mileage example,shame about the colour :shock: .
If it was red with black leather I'd be keen.
http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/771845.htm
RobCrezz
Posts: 1509
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 10:16 am
Location: Essex

Re: MR2 Turbo VS Honda Integra Type R???

Post by RobCrezz »

Lauren wrote:
RobCrezz wrote:
It doesnt use leaf springs in the traditional sense. It uses independent unequal length double wishbones with transverse fiberglass mono-leaf spring mounted to allow for anti-roll effect.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corvette_leaf_springs

You shouldnt knock it just because it uses something relitivly low tech. Look at the LS range of V8 engines. They may be high capacity but they are very lightweight (comparable to alot of 4cyl engines in weight) for the power they produce and very efficient too.


Thanks for that very interesting. :+: I didn't actually realise that it was being used in this way, so all news to me, you learn something every day etc.

Must say though i'm still completely underhwelmed by Merkin 2valve V8 engines. I was at a wedding at the weekend a friend of mine has an F355, (he brought it up, hadn't seen it till now) now that sounds like a proper engine to me, tuneful in a way that a merkin engine could never be.

So for me a V8 needs to be Italian or at least European (ie BMW M3 etc).


No prob :thumleft:

Agree with you regarding the engines too. The sound of a 355/360/430 =P~


There is something about Merc V8s too, but in a different way. Less screamy, more earthquake.
nikaiyo
Posts: 1443
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 7:41 pm

Re: MR2 Turbo VS Honda Integra Type R???

Post by nikaiyo »

Lauren wrote:
RobCrezz wrote:
It doesnt use leaf springs in the traditional sense. It uses independent unequal length double wishbones with transverse fiberglass mono-leaf spring mounted to allow for anti-roll effect.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corvette_leaf_springs

You shouldnt knock it just because it uses something relitivly low tech. Look at the LS range of V8 engines. They may be high capacity but they are very lightweight (comparable to alot of 4cyl engines in weight) for the power they produce and very efficient too.


Thanks for that very interesting. :+: I didn't actually realise that it was being used in this way, so all news to me, you learn something every day etc.

Must say though i'm still completely underhwelmed by Merkin 2valve V8 engines. I was at a wedding at the weekend a friend of mine has an F355, (he brought it up, hadn't seen it till now) now that sounds like a proper engine to me, tuneful in a way that a merkin engine could never be.

So for me a V8 needs to be Italian or at least European (ie BMW M3 etc).


A bit like saying Salmon is better than Ribena, they are so different to make comparrison virtually pointless.
A Ferarri V8? is that not the equivalent of buying an American car with a V6?
User avatar
Lauren
IMOC Committee
Posts: 38632
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 5:37 pm
Location: Greater Manchester
Contact:

Re: MR2 Turbo VS Honda Integra Type R???

Post by Lauren »

nikaiyo wrote:
A bit like saying Salmon is better than Ribena, they are so different to make comparrison virtually pointless.
A Ferarri V8? is that not the equivalent of buying an American car with a V6?


Well that is exactly the point i'm making. A merkin V8 doesn't have the class or tunefulness of say a Ferrari V8.

No a Ferrari V8 is nothing like buying a dull as ditchwater underpowered merkin V6. If you've been in a merkin V6 you will know exactly what I mean. This would be underlined by a ride in a Ferrari V8. I've done both so I can tell you that it is not equivalent at all.
2020 GR Yaris - Circuit Pack :lover:
Ekona
Posts: 3772
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2005 7:44 pm
Location: Halstead, Essex

Re: MR2 Turbo VS Honda Integra Type R???

Post by Ekona »

Except that an Italian flat-plane V8 sounds like a bag of rusty old bolts being rattled in a tin can. I much prefer the deeper rasp of a US-sourced V8, or even *gulp* a German one.

Best sound at Le Mans this year by a country mile were the C6.Rs. Absolutely glorious.
nikaiyo
Posts: 1443
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 7:41 pm

Re: MR2 Turbo VS Honda Integra Type R???

Post by nikaiyo »

Lauren wrote:
nikaiyo wrote:
A bit like saying Salmon is better than Ribena, they are so different to make comparrison virtually pointless.
A Ferarri V8? is that not the equivalent of buying an American car with a V6?


Well that is exactly the point i'm making. A merkin V8 doesn't have the class or tunefulness of say a Ferrari V8.

No a Ferrari V8 is nothing like buying a dull as ditchwater underpowered merkin V6. If you've been in a merkin V6 you will know exactly what I mean. This would be underlined by a ride in a Ferrari V8. I've done both so I can tell you that it is not equivalent at all.


Yeah but they are built to do totally different jobs, the old pushrod 5.7 V8's with 150bhp were designed to run virtually unserviced for 20,000miles and be serviceable by a hick mechanic in Alabama.

A Ferrari V8 needs specialist care etc. Compare the motor from a F355 to say a Jack Roush 5.7 V8 and the power outputs are similar and the sound of those engines makes the F355 sound pretty lame.

Dont get me wrong a Ferarri engine produces much greater power etc but its a different beast.

My point about Ferrari V8 and US V6 is that a Ferrari V8 is the 2nd choice Ferrari power unit much as the 6 pots are in the US. I was not trying to say a Ferarri V8 performes like a US V6.
JohnnyC
Posts: 7001
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 10:25 pm
Location: West Yorkshire

Re: MR2 Turbo VS Honda Integra Type R???

Post by JohnnyC »

Slightly off topic, but features an Integra...

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=fYmpZq3mo ... re=related


And then someone did this to the vid...
http://www.reflecton.co.uk/bennyteg/bennyteg.html

:mrgreen: :clap: #-o
Image
-:[KM]:-
Posts: 2221
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Nottingham

Re: MR2 Turbo VS Honda Integra Type R???

Post by -:[KM]:- »

Merkin
mer⋅kin   /ˈmɜrkən/ [mur-kuhn]

–noun false hair for the female pudenda.

Origin:
1610–20; orig. uncert





I like to contribute... :oops:
:eye:
Image
RobCrezz
Posts: 1509
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 10:16 am
Location: Essex

Re: MR2 Turbo VS Honda Integra Type R???

Post by RobCrezz »

johnp wrote:Referring to the Honda Integra side of this discussion,there is another Honda...more refined and comfortable than a Teg,200hp v-tec engine with more torque,handling excellent for a fwd machine.
However it's mostly forgotten now,considered very uncool and fairly rare, so hard to find a good one.
THE HONDA PRELUDE 2.2 V-TEC MONTEGI.
This looks a good low mileage example,shame about the colour :shock: .
If it was red with black leather I'd be keen.
http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/771845.htm


Its "Motegi" there is no N. And all the Motegi part was the bodykit.

I had a 2.2 VTEC prelude, it was a good car, more of a GT than the Integra though.
johnp
Posts: 2146
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 4:06 pm
Location: Chesterfield

Re: MR2 Turbo VS Honda Integra Type R???

Post by johnp »

RobCrezz wrote:
johnp wrote:Referring to the Honda Integra side of this discussion,there is another Honda...more refined and comfortable than a Teg,200hp v-tec engine with more torque,handling excellent for a fwd machine.
However it's mostly forgotten now,considered very uncool and fairly rare, so hard to find a good one.
THE HONDA PRELUDE 2.2 V-TEC MONTEGI.
This looks a good low mileage example,shame about the colour :shock: .
If it was red with black leather I'd be keen.
http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/771845.htm


Its "Motegi" there is no N. And all the Motegi part was the bodykit.

I had a 2.2 VTEC prelude, it was a good car, more of a GT than the Integra though.

Thank you for correcting my spelling,but I think you will find that the Motegi also had the 17'' wheels standard and the engine produced more power (although the higher power engine IIRC was standardised on the later ordinary V-tec) and ,to further confuse things, the standard car could have the wheels and bodykit as extras.
Post Reply

Return to “Driving Experiences”