![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
i'll start, rev 1 is quicker
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
replies below.
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members
RobCrezz wrote:Stock for stock, the v6 may just pip it, but most tubbys have at least an exhaust while would give it a bit more boost and enough to beat the v6.
Dale_V wrote:who cares
RobCrezz wrote:Stock for stock, the v6 may just pip it, but most tubbys have at least an exhaust while would give it a bit more boost and enough to beat the v6.
marcbowden wrote:But I have an exhaust, also.![]()
.
.
I think part of the question should be, what do we mean by faster, in a straight line, on a track, what.
.
.
personally I'd be very interested in stock vs stock on a track.
RobCrezz wrote:Stock for stock, the v6 may just pip it, but most tubbys have at least an exhaust while would give it a bit more boost and enough to beat the v6.
steve b wrote:V6 as most rev1's& 2 when stock and put on the dyno struggle to make 200bhp.
![]()
![]()
My own old rev2 when stock at a dyno day; fresh low mileage engine from Rogue, new dizzy& leads made only 210bhp.
![]()
I know around the time it got a lot of discussion and the majority of rev1
& 2 cars dyno'd stock came out low, rev3 cars however tended to hit 245bhp on the head as stock on the same day at the same RR.
![]()
![]()
Most of themodifed
- exhaust, filter and boost increase
- no management
rev1's
& 2's failed to make the
"expected" power, almost all were under 250bhp whatever the boost was cranked up to, I know one lad just to try and give a shock result cranked it to 20psi,.
.
.
result same as everyone else running 14/15psi, about stock rev3 power.
jimGTS wrote:steve b wrote:V6 as most rev1's& 2 when stock and put on the dyno struggle to make 200bhp.
![]()
![]()
My own old rev2 when stock at a dyno day; fresh low mileage engine from Rogue, new dizzy& leads made only 210bhp.
![]()
I know around the time it got a lot of discussion and the majority of rev1
& 2 cars dyno'd stock came out low, rev3 cars however tended to hit 245bhp on the head as stock on the same day at the same RR.
![]()
![]()
Most of themodifed
- exhaust, filter and boost increase
- no management
rev1's
& 2's failed to make the
"expected" power, almost all were under 250bhp whatever the boost was cranked up to, I know one lad just to try and give a shock result cranked it to 20psi,.
.
.
result same as everyone else running 14/15psi, about stock rev3 power.
agree regarding a modded rev1/2..
.
.none make more than 210atw with a ct26 over here.
.
.
.
bare in mind the v6s installed over here arnt pulling 200hp stock..
.not the ones ive seen fitted.
not to mention EVERY v6 ive seen has at least an exhaust mod, head or afm mod..
.
.you cant fit a stock camry exhaust to an mr2 afaik, lol.
.
.so it will be modded to, lol.
even 200hp rev1/2 will still put out 180-200lb..
.
.i dont think the v6 does that.
very close anyway.
antnkel wrote:I know what would sort this out, a track day![]()
mrtee wrote:theres no such thing as a stock v6 so on that pretence spend the extra on the turbo![]()