![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![Embarassed :oops:](./images/smilies/icon_redface.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
The End
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![Mr. Green :mrgreen:](./images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif)
Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members
andyc1988 wrote:you must have known it would happen lol
matt_mr2t wrote:What are the NA Carerra's these days, about tree fiddy?
Dunno why I said tree fiddy, three fifty sounded boring.
matt_mr2t wrote:I had a run in a couple of years ago with a 911, pretty sure it was an NA.![]()
He wasnt pulling much on me on the open part of the road but as soon as it got slightly bumpy and twisty he was gone.It just outhandled the MR2 by a country mile.
That's the difference between a modern
"supercar" and an old sports car.
![]()
I dont even recall seeing his brake lights!
dervbas wrote:My mate's just got£12k out on loan to buy a pre 04 911 3.2 n/a.
My tubby shud be a good match eh?
.
bigger intercooler
.
MBC 15psi
.
FCD
.
Apexi intake
.
str8 thru Mongoose exhaust
?
matt_mr2t wrote:I think you people are missing the point here.Straight lines it's easy, but you make the roads a bit less than flat and straight and the Porsche just disapears.
![]()
Well I say disapears, what I mean is, it can cover that ground with far less effort or fear of death.