Marf wrote:Turbo > V6 > BEAMS > NA
Turbo > V6 > BEAMS > NA> Pushbike (marginally).
Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members
Marf wrote:Turbo > V6 > BEAMS > NA
Rory wrote:sheppy is correct - I've never seen a thread about someone transplanting an NA engine into their turbo or selling their turbo to upgrade to an NA.
NA serves a purpose for people who maybe cant get insurance on a turbo or cant afford to buy a turbo (although now days you can pick up turbos for peanuts) or maybe people who just want a 2 for the looks over performance.
Kongaroo wrote:
Mk2 turbo handling is nice anyway I think. I have the MR2 and mk1 MX5 both running Koni adjustable setups and although both are good I think the MR2 setup wins hands down. There just isn't quite enough suspension travel in the MX5 strut to stop it from bottoming out on deep bumps at speed - the MR2 Koni's are about perfect in this respect.
Marf wrote:Turbo > V6 > BEAMS > NA
Ste2 wrote:Marf wrote:Turbo > V6 > BEAMS > NA
2GRFE > Turbo ?
RedMR² wrote:I prefer forced induction over NA. My personal preference.
Each to their own. I do like the sound of a spooling turbo behind thee 'ol nappa.