![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![thumleft :thumleft:](./images/smilies/icon_thumleft.gif)
Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members
synXero wrote:I lowered my rev5 on Apex springs.Also have adjustable shock inserts but left as-is.
The ride is as good as standard, if there has been a difference I don't believe I'd ever notice.
Mud flaps do catch on speed bumps now which is a thing, and if you're going lower than-30 no flaps!
Define what you want, first- slammed, subtle, ride comfort priorities, handling.
.
.
rowey200 wrote:synXero wrote:I lowered my rev5 on Apex springs.Also have adjustable shock inserts but left as-is.
The ride is as good as standard, if there has been a difference I don't believe I'd ever notice.
Mud flaps do catch on speed bumps now which is a thing, and if you're going lower than-30 no flaps!
Define what you want, first- slammed, subtle, ride comfort priorities, handling.
.
.
The Apex springs lower about the car about 30mm all round right? Have you got a side profile pic you could load up?
I'm after a meaner stance that will not compromise comfort too much![]()
DangerJim wrote:I think the ride quality of the MR2 is spot on from stock, I'm a little worried the Teins may be too firm.I like the idea of the softer Apex but the 37
/ 38mm drop of the Teins is what's holding me to them at the moment.
rowey200 wrote:
Lovely motor you have mate..
.
.I think, looking at your pics, a decision has been made, i'm going to pop a set of the Apex springs on
![]()
HighwayStar wrote:Earlier cars had higher ride heights anyway so since most aftermarket manufacturers'drop' measurements use these as the base people with later cars often see little visible difference changing from sagging 13yr plus originals to unused new
'lowering' springs.
![]()
R