Hello folks - a very green newby here.
I am looking to buy a 1997 MR2 GT 16V but I am unsure of the engine it has and / or the model. It was first registered in August 1997 and is a UK car but I am led to believe it could have either the 3SGE or the 3SFE.
Other than asking the seller, is there anyway of finding out which it might be?
If the above is a particularly stupid question then please excuse my ignorance and be gentle with me. My only excuse is that I am much more up to speed with the MKIV Supra than I am the Mr2.
[Mk2] [Generic] Which engine would it have?
Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members
-
- IMOC Affiliated Trackday Organiser
- Posts: 10506
- Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 9:49 am
- Location: South Yorkshire
Re: [Mk2] [Generic] Which engine would it have?
If it is a GTi (UK) or G-Ltd (import) will have the 3S-GE. The GT was a turbo, and therefore has the 3S-GTE.
The 3S-FE was used only in a limited number of early UK cars.
The 3S-FE was used only in a limited number of early UK cars.
Re: [Mk2] [Generic] Which engine would it have?
Peter Gidden - SBITS wrote:If it is a GTi (UK) or G-Ltd (import) will have the 3S-GE. The GT was a turbo, and therefore has the 3S-GTE.
The 3S-FE was used only in a limited number of early UK cars.
Thank you very much for the swift reply.
Now all I have to do is agree a deal to buy it
Re: [Mk2] [Generic] Which engine would it have?
CJ wrote:I am looking to buy a 1997 MR2 GT 16V but I am unsure of the engine it has and / or the model. It was first registered in August 1997 and is a UK car but I am led to believe it could have either the 3SGE or the 3SFE.
Sorry to rain on your parade mate but if it's a UK car then it won't be a turbo (3SGTE), 1997 will make it a later gen (rev3+) 3SGE
-
- IMOC Affiliated Trackday Organiser
- Posts: 10506
- Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 9:49 am
- Location: South Yorkshire
Re: [Mk2] [Generic] Which engine would it have?
ashman wrote:CJ wrote:I am looking to buy a 1997 MR2 GT 16V but I am unsure of the engine it has and / or the model. It was first registered in August 1997 and is a UK car but I am led to believe it could have either the 3SGE or the 3SFE.
Sorry to rain on your parade mate ...
That's a bit fierce! The OP is a new member, asking a sensible question about N/A engines
-
- Posts: 2045
- Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 11:45 pm
- Location: Birmingham
Re: [Mk2] [Generic] Which engine would it have?
I feel sorry for the poor blokes that buy MR2s with the 3SFE and then find out about the 3SGE and GTE variants!!!
Josh
Josh
Re: [Mk2] [Generic] Which engine would it have?
Peter Gidden - SBITS wrote:ashman wrote:CJ wrote:I am looking to buy a 1997 MR2 GT 16V but I am unsure of the engine it has and / or the model. It was first registered in August 1997 and is a UK car but I am led to believe it could have either the 3SGE or the 3SFE.
Sorry to rain on your parade mate ...
That's a bit fierce! The OP is a new member, asking a sensible question about N/A engines
Sorry!! Wasn't intended to be fierce at all, was obviously still waking up-- many apologies
Agreed- very sensible question, was really just concerned the OP didn't agree to buy a car thinking it was a turbo only to find it was an NA...
Re: [Mk2] [Generic] Which engine would it have?
SwissHeavy wrote:I feel sorry for the poor blokes that buy MR2s with the 3SFE and then find out about the 3SGE and GTE variants!!!
Josh
I did that, bought my first MK2 in 2002, and it was a 3SFE. I was pretty gutted when I started to learn about MR2s and found that my (then) MR2 had a whole 119bhp, and 0-60 in 9.3s!
At the time I bought my first MK2, I knew not of the turbo version, and thought that they all had 158bhp
-
- Posts: 2045
- Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 11:45 pm
- Location: Birmingham
Re: [Mk2] [Generic] Which engine would it have?
Best way to learn is to make mistakes
Re: [Mk2] [Generic] Which engine would it have?
SwissHeavy wrote:Best way to learn is to make mistakes
Suppose, would have cost less if I'd have looked on here before buying LOL
-
- Posts: 2962
- Joined: Fri Aug 02, 2013 2:08 am
- Location: Bristol
Re: [Mk2] [Generic] Which engine would it have?
I think too many people give the 3sfe a hard time.
I love my 3sfe and wouldn't change it for any other engine, especially a turbo. I can understand the appeal but the 3sfe is a reliable and proven engine. Also its cheaper to insure, tax, and run. Not to mention that they're also a lot rarer now - they will continue to get rarer as not many were produced with the 3sfe and lots have now died or been converted.
Horses for courses I suppose
I'm not too worried about speed or horsepower as my daily driver is a speed machine (3 ltr merc). So for me, the MR2 comes out for shows, country drives, and to be worked on.
My advice would be to go for a well cared and maintained car regardless of engine. If your that worried about having a tubby you can always do a conversion (I would encourage you to, as it makes my 3sfe rarer lol)
I love my 3sfe and wouldn't change it for any other engine, especially a turbo. I can understand the appeal but the 3sfe is a reliable and proven engine. Also its cheaper to insure, tax, and run. Not to mention that they're also a lot rarer now - they will continue to get rarer as not many were produced with the 3sfe and lots have now died or been converted.
Horses for courses I suppose
I'm not too worried about speed or horsepower as my daily driver is a speed machine (3 ltr merc). So for me, the MR2 comes out for shows, country drives, and to be worked on.
My advice would be to go for a well cared and maintained car regardless of engine. If your that worried about having a tubby you can always do a conversion (I would encourage you to, as it makes my 3sfe rarer lol)
-
- Posts: 2962
- Joined: Fri Aug 02, 2013 2:08 am
- Location: Bristol
Re: [Mk2] [Generic] Which engine would it have?
PS it sounds like it will have a 3s-ge engine
Easier to get parts for and nice to work on
Easier to get parts for and nice to work on
Re: [Mk2] [Generic] Which engine would it have?
KarlBristol wrote:I think too many people give the 3sfe a hard time.
I love my 3sfe and wouldn't change it for any other engine, especially a turbo. I can understand the appeal but the 3sfe is a reliable and proven engine. Also its cheaper to insure, tax, and run. Not to mention that they're also a lot rarer now - they will continue to get rarer as not many were produced with the 3sfe and lots have now died or been converted.
Horses for courses I suppose
I'm not too worried about speed or horsepower as my daily driver is a speed machine (3 ltr merc). So for me, the MR2 comes out for shows, country drives, and to be worked on.
My advice would be to go for a well cared and maintained car regardless of engine. If your that worried about having a tubby you can always do a conversion (I would encourage you to, as it makes my 3sfe rarer lol)
Yep, each to their own mate as you say, cheaper tax on 'FE? They're all done on engine size at that era mate, all 2 litre cars, so same tax price
-
- Posts: 2962
- Joined: Fri Aug 02, 2013 2:08 am
- Location: Bristol
Re: [Mk2] [Generic] Which engine would it have?
RedMR² wrote:Yep, each to their own mate as you say, cheaper tax on 'FE? They're all done on engine size at that era mate, all 2 litre cars, so same tax price
Learn something new every day
I thought it was a combination of engine size and emissions originally then it changed over in around 93ish to a few more variants
-
- Posts: 2962
- Joined: Fri Aug 02, 2013 2:08 am
- Location: Bristol
Re: [Mk2] [Generic] Which engine would it have?
I'm pretty sure mines £118 for 6 months
Re: [Mk2] [Generic] Which engine would it have?
KarlBristol wrote:I'm pretty sure mines £118 for 6 months
Tax based on emissions from March 2001 I believe, engine size prior to that.
My tax is £118 for 6 months.
Re: [Mk2] [Generic] Which engine would it have?
Thanks for all the replies fellas.
Sorry for the late reply but I had forgotten to turn on the notification of thread replies - now sorted.
I didn't take the replies as being aggressive so no worries there although I was a bit confused as to why you may have thought I was expecting a turbo model? That was never the case. I knew it was an N/A - just not sure which one.
Anyway, the car is now bought and will be collected next weekend - cant wait.
Sorry for the late reply but I had forgotten to turn on the notification of thread replies - now sorted.
I didn't take the replies as being aggressive so no worries there although I was a bit confused as to why you may have thought I was expecting a turbo model? That was never the case. I knew it was an N/A - just not sure which one.
Anyway, the car is now bought and will be collected next weekend - cant wait.
Re: [Mk2] [Generic] Which engine would it have?
CJ wrote:although I was a bit confused as to why you may have thought I was expecting a turbo model? That was never the case. I knew it was an N/A - just not sure which one.
Think it was solely because your original post said you were going to look at a 1997 GT 16V, suggesting it was an import. (GT and GTS models were japanese import turbos) UK 1997 cars were GTi-16 variants, not GT's
-
- Posts: 2962
- Joined: Fri Aug 02, 2013 2:08 am
- Location: Bristol
Re: [Mk2] [Generic] Which engine would it have?
Pleased you've bought it - welcome to the fold
I can't wait to see full photos of it when you pick the car up ... bet you can't wait!
What sort of service history etc is with it?
I can't wait to see full photos of it when you pick the car up ... bet you can't wait!
What sort of service history etc is with it?
Re: [Mk2] [Generic] Which engine would it have?
RedMR² wrote:CJ wrote:although I was a bit confused as to why you may have thought I was expecting a turbo model? That was never the case. I knew it was an N/A - just not sure which one.
Think it was solely because your original post said you were going to look at a 1997 GT 16V, suggesting it was an import. (GT and GTS models were japanese import turbos) UK 1997 cars were GTi-16 variants, not GT's
Ah right. I stand (or in this case) sit corrected. I see I have much to learn