[Mk2] [Turbo] ST205 vs Cinq

Posts about anything do to with modifying your car such as fitting aftermarket parts, bodykit, or tuning the engine for more performance.

Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members

Ruishy1
Posts: 195
Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 12:26 pm
Location: Kilmarnock

[Mk2] [Turbo] ST205 vs Cinq

Post by Ruishy1 »

Has anyone actually done a comparitive test between these 2 ?

just wanna know which one is the better one before i part with cash either way :thumleft:

hearsay doesnt count im afraid [-X
dai21t
Posts: 872
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 1:16 pm
Location: Llanelli

Re: [Mk2] [Turbo] ST205 vs Cinq

Post by dai21t »

comparing what? ones a 4wd toyota, ones a 2wd fiat.

but if you're on about chargecooler rads then the 205 one doesn't fit the mr2 whereas the fiat one does.
Marf
Posts: 6728
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 4:56 pm
Location: West Sussex

Re: [Mk2] [Turbo] ST205 vs Cinq

Post by Marf »

dai21t wrote:

but if you're on about chargecooler rads then the 205 one doesn't fit the mr2 whereas the fiat one does.


Thats the rub. Not really worth even comparing the two when the 205 rad is a non starter for an MR2 :thumleft:
Dale_V
Posts: 7979
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 1:27 pm
Contact:

Re: [Mk2] [Turbo] ST205 vs Cinq

Post by Dale_V »

apparantly they do fit:

http://www.imoc.co.uk/forums/viewtopic. ... t=#1082831

Leaki Tbar and I fitted one to his Rev 4 (without air con) and it was a simple straight forward job, was perfect fit and hose ends were easily workable as well, also a very efficient rad.
Marf
Posts: 6728
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 4:56 pm
Location: West Sussex

Re: [Mk2] [Turbo] ST205 vs Cinq

Post by Marf »

If you're willing to ditch the AC as I understand it.
Ruishy1
Posts: 195
Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 12:26 pm
Location: Kilmarnock

Re: [Mk2] [Turbo] ST205 vs Cinq

Post by Ruishy1 »

im in scotland, so aircon is very rarely needed, so ditching it and saving power and weight :)

ive heard the 205 one is more efficient than the cinq rad, and if it is i would rather have that tbh.

But would like to know for sure :thumleft:
Charged
IMOC Committee
Posts: 8897
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 8:09 pm
Location: Herts

Re: [Mk2] [Turbo] ST205 vs Cinq

Post by Charged »

They do fit, it's just a pain to make them fit. The Fiat rad is efficient enough.
If you can't see the angle, you're in trouble.
Ruishy1
Posts: 195
Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 12:26 pm
Location: Kilmarnock

Re: [Mk2] [Turbo] ST205 vs Cinq

Post by Ruishy1 »

im not asking about efficient enough, id like to know the more efficient one :mrgreen:

that sounds nasty mate but its not meant like that :thumleft:
Charged
IMOC Committee
Posts: 8897
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 8:09 pm
Location: Herts

Re: [Mk2] [Turbo] ST205 vs Cinq

Post by Charged »

Ruishy1 wrote:im not asking about efficient enough, id like to know the more efficient one :mrgreen:

that sounds nasty mate but its not meant like that :thumleft:


I'm no expert but I daresay the difference between the two rads makes very little (if any) difference at all.
If you can't see the angle, you're in trouble.
Dale_V
Posts: 7979
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 1:27 pm
Contact:

Re: [Mk2] [Turbo] ST205 vs Cinq

Post by Dale_V »

agree with ollie, with inlet temps at 35deg C max so far from my CC with chinq rad, surely that cant be sniffed at being so consistant
Ruishy1
Posts: 195
Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 12:26 pm
Location: Kilmarnock

Re: [Mk2] [Turbo] ST205 vs Cinq

Post by Ruishy1 »

but then, why buy a cinq rad, if the st205 one is more efficient and can be had for less and is easier to fit, its all relative :D
Dale_V
Posts: 7979
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 1:27 pm
Contact:

Re: [Mk2] [Turbo] ST205 vs Cinq

Post by Dale_V »

a chinq rad can be had for £40 delivered NEW, st205 will have to be 2nd hand meaning condition will vary, unless you want raping by toyota

the chinq rad is smaller and easier to fit

coolant temps of a CC dont really warrant a big radiator. the only time the coolant will properly heat up, is when the engine is off and the pumps not flowing, allowing heatsoak.
Ruishy1
Posts: 195
Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 12:26 pm
Location: Kilmarnock

Re: [Mk2] [Turbo] ST205 vs Cinq

Post by Ruishy1 »

the bigger rad, the lower the temps, the higher the power, every little helps
Dale_V
Posts: 7979
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 1:27 pm
Contact:

Re: [Mk2] [Turbo] ST205 vs Cinq

Post by Dale_V »

Ruishy1 wrote:the bigger rad, the lower the temps, the higher the power, every little helps


what engine/spec are you going for? is it a road car/track/drag?
dai21t
Posts: 872
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 1:16 pm
Location: Llanelli

Re: [Mk2] [Turbo] ST205 vs Cinq

Post by dai21t »

My car is running at 391bhp with a fiat radiator, seems to work fine for me.
Ruishy1
Posts: 195
Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 12:26 pm
Location: Kilmarnock

Re: [Mk2] [Turbo] ST205 vs Cinq

Post by Ruishy1 »

an amalgamation of all 3 :)

will be doing all, as its just a fun car, not a daily driver.

will prob just get the st205 rad as from what i can fathom its more efficient, but only time will tell.
toxo
IMOC Committee
Posts: 11345
Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 5:41 pm
Location: The Toast Aisle
Contact:

Re: [Mk2] [Turbo] ST205 vs Cinq

Post by toxo »

Efficiency is the wrong word, it's just bigger. It has more rows and more fins and therefore offers a greater cooling capability than a smaller radiator. The ST205 prerad is MASSIVE and IMHO the extra hassle fitting vastly outweighs any benefit you will see. Plus as mentioned above by Dale, any rad you get will be 2nd hand + 10 years old whereas the Fiat rad is smaller, lighter, cheaper etc.

Remember when Toyota designed this system for the Celica they did it with 2m of coolant pipes (all of which, and the radiator, were right next to the engine for some nice heatsoak), when you install it on an MR2 you have 10m of coolant pipes, and as a result vastly more coolant capacity. Therefore the radiator doesn't have to work as hard, so you don't require the higher level of cooling afforded to you by using an ST205 prerad.
IMOC-UK - the only club to win 'Best Club Stand' at JAE more than once, and twice in a row!
Ruishy1
Posts: 195
Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 12:26 pm
Location: Kilmarnock

Re: [Mk2] [Turbo] ST205 vs Cinq

Post by Ruishy1 »

thats the kind of answer i was looking for, not just " use the cinq one becuase we all have " ](*,)

cheers mate, il do some research into rads to see if there are ones that might fit ith a little less parts required, if not il get a cinq one
toxo
IMOC Committee
Posts: 11345
Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 5:41 pm
Location: The Toast Aisle
Contact:

Re: [Mk2] [Turbo] ST205 vs Cinq

Post by toxo »

The main reasons for using the cinquicento/seicento rad is that you can:
a) keep the aircon, even with a stock bumper
b) the mounts on the radiator line up with bolts / holes on the front of the MR2

People may well fit them because they're sheep and it's what everyone else does, but somewhere back in the day that rad was chosen by someone for good reasons!
IMOC-UK - the only club to win 'Best Club Stand' at JAE more than once, and twice in a row!
Marf
Posts: 6728
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 4:56 pm
Location: West Sussex

Re: [Mk2] [Turbo] ST205 vs Cinq

Post by Marf »

Image

baaaa!
Post Reply

Return to “Modifications”