![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
Cheers
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
Craig
Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members
Jon S wrote:Mine's a bit creaky.![]()
Considering a Rev1 is at least 13 years old, it can't be that bad.However, I suspect you're talking about performance rather than longevity
![]()
![]()
If that's the case I haven't really got a clue.But an upgrade is probably a good idea because if stuff needs replacing due to age, you might as well replace with performance parts.
Just my thoughts
Lauren wrote:The springs and dampers are going to be getting pretty tired on a 15 year old car tbh.
Konis and aftermarket springs would be the most sensible option.
what are you running on your car at the moment? Does it have the stock NA dampers with lowered springs?
RedMR² wrote:Lauren wrote:The springs and dampers are going to be getting pretty tired on a 15 year old car tbh.
Konis and aftermarket springs would be the most sensible option.
what are you running on your car at the moment? Does it have the stock NA dampers with lowered springs?
The revision 1 cars had the same suspension across all models so in effect, stock turbo suspension with lowered 40mm springs![]()
MegatronUK wrote:Ask Dan at DCdezign.co.uk.
.
.
he does them for a very good price.
RedMR² wrote:
The revision 1 cars had the same suspension across all models so in effect, stock turbo suspension with lowered 40mm springs![]()
How much also for the Konis?
tallbruv wrote:Are after market shocks heavier?![]()
Rogue wrote:Turbo models had uprated suspension from Revision 2 onwards.Revision 1 cars that I've driven on stock shocks and springs have seemed a bit wallowy, but don't forget that there were changes to the suspension geometry on later cars as well.
.
.
Rogue