At last,3 years on... 393hp@8200rpms' is this a little low?!
Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members
Re: At last,3 years on... 393hp@8200rpms' is this a little low?!
As said already matey your main problem is you need to create a scoop to grab the air into the intercooler the way it is designed at mo the air is gunna just rush past
-
- Posts: 3493
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2005 4:16 pm
- Location: www.toyotagt.co.uk
- Contact:
Re: At last,3 years on... 393hp@8200rpms' is this a little low?!
The main problem is size/efficency of the cooler.

Im now up and running with a similar design so not to fill the boot and ecu with water but have no issue with charge temps due to a good intercooler.
If running a scoop to the boot you need to relocate the ecu.

James


Im now up and running with a similar design so not to fill the boot and ecu with water but have no issue with charge temps due to a good intercooler.



James
call James on 01256 883386 or 07786073755
Re: At last,3 years on... 393hp@8200rpms' is this a little low?!
When i looked at owens at yours james, you guys had made that brill shroud for it to seal it so i doubt any water would get near ecu.
Shamek skills on that project were fantastic.
=D>




-
- Posts: 3493
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2005 4:16 pm
- Location: www.toyotagt.co.uk
- Contact:
Re: At last,3 years on... 393hp@8200rpms' is this a little low?!
You would think so wouldnt you, we still had water ingress problems, i would bet my left arm that if you have that cooler tested it would be better using the stock one.
It was removed from another car for the same reasons, if the new tuner reckons he can produce 80 hp from a better cooler some ign advancs and leaning the fuel it just confirms what the first tuner said only it would appear the cooler was a restriction as well as inefficient majorly affecting spool.

Allowing too much water in the boot by making a scoop is a mistake in my mind for what was sopposed to be a daily driver with 500 ponies.



Allowing too much water in the boot by making a scoop is a mistake in my mind for what was sopposed to be a daily driver with 500 ponies.

call James on 01256 883386 or 07786073755
Re: At last,3 years on... 393hp@8200rpms' is this a little low?!
did you guys find out anything about the cam set up with this? first power readings i heard weren't much above stanard mr2 turbo factory powers and that wouldn't be down to an intercooler flow problem unless someone welded it shut, lol

Tim
xxxx

Tim
xxxx
-
- IMOC Affiliated Company
- Posts: 4928
- Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 9:33 am
- Location: 01442 601301
- Contact:
Re: At last,3 years on... 393hp@8200rpms' is this a little low?!
hahaha


Maybe oversized valves would've helped.
Kinda suprised it wasn't done already with the rest of the spec.


Oh, and Elmo, that vid is sweet





Maybe oversized valves would've helped.




Oh, and Elmo, that vid is sweet


-
- Posts: 3493
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2005 4:16 pm
- Location: www.toyotagt.co.uk
- Contact:
Re: At last,3 years on... 393hp@8200rpms' is this a little low?!
We have not had the car back at the workshop since T.J played with the cams during the mapping so i dont know.

Yep oversized valves would have been nice, im sure it was considered.


Yep oversized valves would have been nice, im sure it was considered.

call James on 01256 883386 or 07786073755
-
- Posts: 638
- Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 10:43 am
- Location: Ramsgate, Kent
- Contact:
Re: At last,3 years on... 393hp@8200rpms' is this a little low?!
True true,
the cams have not been played with since TJ touched them.
Also james,i gotta point out,the car is solid as a rock still,even with the rev-limiter being used ofter

The build is brilliant.
I'll keep you posted on the findings matey.

the cams have not been played with since TJ touched them.

Also james,i gotta point out,the car is solid as a rock still,even with the rev-limiter being used ofter



The build is brilliant.

I'll keep you posted on the findings matey.

