![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members
nakamura wrote:Indeed Munnsy.Never swap the 2!
Alas DC2 o-60 is around 6.5-7.0, DC5 is in the 7's.
So an NA can easy do those.
In an MR2 thrash 2 NAs posted 6.3 and 6.5 0-60 times with satellite timing.The first a Glimited race car from Rogue with a rev3 engine(i believe) the second was a rev2 with a decat.
![]()
Both Integras are brilliant both not super fast, just great all rounders.
eRATic wrote:and you've personally experienced a DC2 then have you Fizz.![]()
fizz wrote:eRATic wrote:and you've personally experienced a DC2 then have you Fizz.![]()
Ive not driven a DC2 but have been a passenger in one where the owner was trying to impress me.I then took him out in my tubby and he was amazed at the difference in terms off power and acceleration in the same roads.
.
![]()
The DC5 however i have driven one personally and yes its quick..
.
Not far off my old Rev 3 tubby in terms off accereration once in Vtec.
![]()
I have also driven a rev 3 NA and i am telling you that the DC2 and DC5 are quicker than any NA MR2..
.
![]()
![]()
eRATic wrote:i trust the TDi has been chipped.had it done to my Alfa 156, big difference now making 225hp
nakamura wrote:Just looked at Hondas offical numbers, 14.8 standing start for a DC2 1/4 mile.0-60 in 6.7.
![]()
John Bateson hit 60 in 6.4 secs and 1/4 mile in 15 flat in a Jtuner thrash.
Very similar id say.
nakamura wrote:Just looked at Hondas offical numbers, 14.8 standing start for a DC2 1/4 mile.0-60 in 6.7.
![]()
John Bateson hit 60 in 6.4 secs and 1/4 mile in 15 flat in a Jtuner thrash.
Very similar id say.
SW20Paul wrote:nakamura wrote:Just looked at Hondas offical numbers, 14.8 standing start for a DC2 1/4 mile.0-60 in 6.7.
![]()
John Bateson hit 60 in 6.4 secs and 1/4 mile in 15 flat in a Jtuner thrash.
Very similar id say.
Yeah but was the MR2 stock? Thats like a second quicker than Toyota say to 60.
15 sec 1/4 mile is very good for an N/A MR2
I still say in real world driving situations the Integra would out accelerate, out brake and out conrner the MR2 no probs.
P.S I think I'm just arguing for the sake of it(im bored)
Scotster wrote:nakamura wrote:Just looked at Hondas offical numbers, 14.8 standing start for a DC2 1/4 mile.0-60 in 6.7.
![]()
John Bateson hit 60 in 6.4 secs and 1/4 mile in 15 flat in a Jtuner thrash.
Very similar id say.
You have to remember that the honda is FWD.A
<7 sec 0-60 in a FWD car is amazing to be honest and it just shows that once in VTec mode it must really take off.
Slowest part of the DC2 is going to be off the line.
Scott=op
nakamura wrote:SW20Paul wrote:nakamura wrote:Just looked at Hondas offical numbers, 14.8 standing start for a DC2 1/4 mile.0-60 in 6.7.
![]()
John Bateson hit 60 in 6.4 secs and 1/4 mile in 15 flat in a Jtuner thrash.
Very similar id say.
Yeah but was the MR2 stock? Thats like a second quicker than Toyota say to 60.
15 sec 1/4 mile is very good for an N/A MR2
I still say in real world driving situations the Integra would out accelerate, out brake and out conrner the MR2 no probs.
P.S I think I'm just arguing for the sake of it(im bored)
lol!
Just de-cat and mongoose.Which is fair considering the SW20 is much older.
![]()
Im gonna open this up more now, how about a type r vs a BEAMS!!!!