![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
I am considering just a standard UK model N/A 1998 model which seems ok, yet to drive one though.
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
what's the 0-60 on the turbo and the n/a?
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
Thanks!
Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members
Munnsy wrote:Also if you get an n/a i personally would go for an import, slightly better performance than the uk
KrisMoyse wrote:Well..
.
.
.
.I've got a n/a and it's crept out on me a few times and when it does it scares the crap outta you, even worse now its wet and wintery.
And from the storys I've heard/read turbos are a lot more of a beast.
So reverting back to my point:
If you haven't driven a rear wheel drive sports car before(like myself), I personally would go for a n/a to get used to the feeling of one.
Insurance is a lot cheaper as is petrol and they still go like the stink when you put your foot down(just not quite as much as the turbo).
What I'm saying is if you jump straight in at the deep end and get a tubby you're more likely to end up in'a bit of bother' than if you got used to a fast sports car
(ie: the N/A) first.
I know finances may not allow or whatever but for your own sake that's what I'd do/did.
Don't get me wrong, I want a tubby.Only had my n/a for a few months but I'm glad I went for that rather than a tubby.
Will give me more time to look for a decent one and insurance ain't so bad a present.
.
.AND I'll know what to expect with the tail-end.
It's your call, just my 2 cents.
andydurham wrote:Im 19 and i drive a Turbo..
.
.
It is completely up to the drivers capabilities to whether or not they can drive any car, personally i dont think there is any problem with snappyness of the back end
(just dont plant your foot half way round a corner)
KrisMoyse wrote:Well..
.
.
.
.I've got a n/a and it's crept out on me a few times and when it does it scares the crap outta you, even worse now its wet and wintery.
And from the storys I've heard/read turbos are a lot more of a beast.
khizrs wrote:I think an n/a UK model will be best.
khizrs wrote:KrisMoyse wrote:Well..
.
.
.
.I've got a n/a and it's crept out on me a few times and when it does it scares the crap outta you, even worse now its wet and wintery.
And from the storys I've heard/read turbos are a lot more of a beast.
So reverting back to my point:
If you haven't driven a rear wheel drive sports car before(like myself), I personally would go for a n/a to get used to the feeling of one.
Insurance is a lot cheaper as is petrol and they still go like the stink when you put your foot down(just not quite as much as the turbo).
What I'm saying is if you jump straight in at the deep end and get a tubby you're more likely to end up in'a bit of bother' than if you got used to a fast sports car
(ie: the N/A) first.
I know finances may not allow or whatever but for your own sake that's what I'd do/did.
Don't get me wrong, I want a tubby.Only had my n/a for a few months but I'm glad I went for that rather than a tubby.
Will give me more time to look for a decent one and insurance ain't so bad a present.
.
.AND I'll know what to expect with the tail-end.
It's your call, just my 2 cents.
True.I will take your advice.
I am only 20, so very inexperienced with sports cars.I drive a RWD barge at the moment
(530d sport) which has plenty of poke, but it will only be a weekend car.
I think an n/a UK model will be best.
Leeroy wrote:Thing is with the turbo is that the power is there, in oodles, and you can get carried away.![]()
If you don't know what to expect then it could put you in a lot of trouble.
![]()
The N/A is a much more progressive drive and IMO a better car to start RWD with.
![]()
I had an N/A for a year before the turbo and really enjoyed it, I learnt about the limits of the car without having so much power on tap.
If you think you can be sensible and take time to learn the behaviour of the car then you'd probably be ok with a tubby first off, just treat it with lots of respect.