No problems with your choice, we all like different things

- and that's just the mk2 fraternity.

I had a Rev1 NA before my turbo, so I know what driving the NA MR2 is like

- but there is a 5 year gap between that and the S2000, so no back to back comparisons.

The S2000's

"lag" I don't think is that bad, The problem is that the kick of the powerband at 4k is so large you think that the below 4k is rubbish.

It's actually comparable with any other 2.0 engine

(I think it's about 160/170bhp

@ 6,000 rpm).

But I do most of my commuting in first gear, and with a de-cat and 2.5" straight through pipe, it's bike like up and down the high street.

I'm a great fan of the drive it like you stole it style, all other cars I drive now feel tame and compromised.

I'm loving the keeping it on the boil and heal and toeing into every roundabout.

I find the car so much more stable on

(and over) the limit and the proper suspension setup really shows.

I also think that the car is as stiff

(if not more so) than my old T-Bar.

There are a few short comings though, when compared to the MR2.

Tunability

.

.

Okay, it's not the quickest thing out there by a long shot, but it's so hard to get anything more.

Praticality

.

.

At 6'4", I've actually got in the boot of an MR2

(was drunk) to get a lift home

.

.

the S2000 has nothing, I packed for JAE, and then couldn't take a passenger.

For me, the MR2 is looking dated, and it's feeling it too.

But I'm lucky that the GF bought my MR2, so we can pootle about in both
