safe levels of boost
Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members
Re: safe levels of boost
And I'm guessing that'll cost an arm and a leg for a full tank?
Re: safe levels of boost
Jonny4494 wrote:And I'm guessing that'll cost an arm and a leg for a full tank?
What you do is buy a very high octane fuel, 116 or 120 and mix it with normal fuel to get the octaine you want
Designer for turbo set ups on F1 cars, and Nitrous Oxide Systems of the USA in the 80s
Re: safe levels of boost
bobhatton wrote:Jonny4494 wrote:And I'm guessing that'll cost an arm and a leg for a full tank?
What you do is buy a very high octane fuel, 116 or 120 and mix it with normal fuel to get the octaine you want
What about toluene? RON 121, MON 102
Re: safe levels of boost
So what sort of ratio for mixing the 2 fuels?
Re: safe levels of boost
Jonny4494 wrote:So what sort of ratio for mixing the 2 fuels?
You have to work that one out depending on the octane of what you are mixing and what octane you want.
Designer for turbo set ups on F1 cars, and Nitrous Oxide Systems of the USA in the 80s
Re: safe levels of boost
See I struggle to believe that 99 isn't good enough. Simply because the Turbo was built and tuned for Japan Super Premium fuel which is 100 ron. I know 99 ron isn't quite enough but surely it is close enough not to cause knock.
I'd happily try to mix my own fuel to make 102 ron but dealing with highly combustible fuel scares me
I'd happily try to mix my own fuel to make 102 ron but dealing with highly combustible fuel scares me
Re: safe levels of boost
Jonny4494 wrote:So would you recommend using tesco's momentum 99 in them? Would it prolong the life of the engine?
I wouldn't use anything other than Super in a Turbo as it was Tuned for Japan and they use 100ron.
The higher the ron the better to avoid predet
Re: safe levels of boost
And we should really be looking at MON ratings rather than RON..
Re: safe levels of boost
Draven wrote:See I struggle to believe that 99 isn't good enough. Simply because the Turbo was built and tuned for Japan Super Premium fuel which is 100 ron. I know 99 ron isn't quite enough but surely it is close enough not to cause knock.
Got to agree with this.
No 2
Re: safe levels of boost
Draven wrote:See I struggle to believe that 99 isn't good enough. Simply because the Turbo was built and tuned for Japan Super Premium fuel which is 100 ron. I know 99 ron isn't quite enough but surely it is close enough not to cause knock.
I'd happily try to mix my own fuel to make 102 ron but dealing with highly combustible fuel scares me
Just do not smoke when doing it.
We have fitted a number of damaged engines now with 8.0:1 pistons and they fly, so much faster than when running 8.5:1 comp on 99 fuel, no knock so the ECU controls as it should
Designer for turbo set ups on F1 cars, and Nitrous Oxide Systems of the USA in the 80s
Re: safe levels of boost
As much as I hate to agree with Bob on anything, he's dead right IMO.
I spanked my rev2 with 22psi, it got serious abuse but it was running 95 octane fuel....it was however running methanol injection which took octane to silly levels on boost though and that there is the difference.
I spanked my rev2 with 22psi, it got serious abuse but it was running 95 octane fuel....it was however running methanol injection which took octane to silly levels on boost though and that there is the difference.
dazzz wrote:I'm no expert but
-
- Posts: 2589
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 10:48 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
Re: safe levels of boost
bobhatton wrote:
Just do not smoke when doing it.
We have fitted a number of damaged engines now with 8.0:1 pistons and they fly, so much faster than when running 8.5:1 comp on 99 fuel, no knock so the ECU controls as it should
Instead of just saying 'oh they fly' maybe you should give us some actual evidence with dyno charts of both examples.
Re: safe levels of boost
Where are all these owners who own these cars??
Re: safe levels of boost
jimGTS wrote:Where are all these owners who own these cars??
Don't know which post that is referring to?
No 2
-
- Posts: 1618
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 10:15 pm
- Location: NEWBURY BERKS
Re: safe levels of boost
Think jimgts comment was.aimed at the owners with the reduced compression pistons fitted
One day the Phoenix will rise from the ashes.
Re: safe levels of boost
Is Shell Nitro+ not 100ron. Sure it is
Re: safe levels of boost
gnzyza wrote:Is Shell Nitro+ not 100ron. Sure it is
99 RON.
Re: safe levels of boost
Race Idiot wrote:bobhatton wrote:
Just do not smoke when doing it.
We have fitted a number of damaged engines now with 8.0:1 pistons and they fly, so much faster than when running 8.5:1 comp on 99 fuel, no knock so the ECU controls as it should
Instead of just saying 'oh they fly' maybe you should give us some actual evidence with dyno charts of both examples.
Why would we want to dyno a damaged engine or a stock rebuilt engine?
The power output will just be stock but the ECU is no longer running under the control of the knock senser so the car drives far better
Designer for turbo set ups on F1 cars, and Nitrous Oxide Systems of the USA in the 80s
Re: safe levels of boost
jimGTS wrote:Where are all these owners who own these cars??
Driving around in Devon and Cornwall.
Designer for turbo set ups on F1 cars, and Nitrous Oxide Systems of the USA in the 80s
Re: safe levels of boost
I'm having a engine rebuild with pistons 8.0:1. I'll let you know if I fly