
aw11rally wrote:The best handling

(but not gripiest)

And there's the distinction that most people miss.

Handling and grip are different things and most people talk about things that

"improve handling" when referring to things that actually increase grip.

Handling is all about how the car reacts near the limit, good handling is very subjective, has a lot to do with personal preference and gives rise to such woolly terms as

"progressiveness",

"balance" and such like.

There are very few universal truths with regard to handling, wider tyres for example might make a car handle better in one drivers opinion or worse in anothers.

Grip on the other hand is much more clinical.

It's quantifiable and is all about how quickly the car will go around around a corner, good handling may give a driver the confidence to try and go around a corner quicker but grip is what will let the car actually do it.

It can be measured and a wider tyre will always give more grip.

For a road car handling is more important than grip.

A car that has enjoyable handling characteristics and will give you some warning that you're pushing too hard will give much more pleasure than one which can go around a corner a few mph quicker but puts you through a hedge backwards with no warning if you overstep the mark.

It's the whole philosophy of the GT86 for example.

For most competitive motorsport activities grip is king.

Getting around the track in the quickest time is the most important thing, the driver is expected to be good enough to learn where the limits are and deal with any

'quirky' handling traits.

The only real exception I can think of might be endurance racing where the car needs to be a little more forgiving both to reduce driver fatigue

(driving a car that's on a knife edge is mentally very tough) and to give a margin of error when fatigue sets in.
