Hi:

The thing is with a repaint is it's very labour intensive.

The actual painting takes hardly any time at all.

It's the surface prep and refinishing that takes all the time.

We all know that wages tend to be different in different parts of the country.

Wages are higher in London but everything else costs more as well.

So a car painter in the South will naturally be charging more than somewhere in the country where the cost of living is less.

Now, it's the same basic task with anyone who wants a repaint simply because it's the same basic car.

So taking the glass out of mine, removing the exterior trim, and so on, will take about the same time no matter who does it.

Provided they are reasonably skilled, of course.

But it's the same number of bolts that have to be undone, the same number of lights, same number of windows, etc.

, etc.

Provided there is no accident damage, rust, that kind of thing, a quality surface prep will take approximately the same time, the painting will be the same and so too will be the refinishing together with the final rebuilding.

So what's the difference?
Quality of the workmanship.

It is precisely because surface prep and refinishing
is
so darned labour intensive that, to do it right, does take a fair degree of skill and a LOT of attention paid to detail.

Simply put, the cheaper the job the less attention will be paid to the myriad of tiny details that go to creating a great paint job.

The other thing is, people's expectations are very different.

In truth, there is no such thing as a 100% mint paint job.

There will be imperfections in

*any* paint job.

Such is the very nature of the application process.

A job that looks good from a little distance away, when looked at closely will have the odd run here and there, little dust-nibs perhaps, slight overspray in places, orange peel in parts, edges that have been ill-prepared.

These are typical examples of the myriad of tiny details that collectively take quite a lot of preparation and refinishing time.

In fact, you could say that the actual painting was the easy part.

What these cheaper places do is give your outer paint a rub down with wet

& dry, mask off, paint, and that's it, you get the car basically as it

"comes off the gun".

That'll cost you what? About fifteen hundred quid.

It may well look good for a while, and a person may think,

"So what if it has the odd run here and there, or a bit of overspray and the like, to me it looks great.

" In which case the person has accepted a lower quality of workmanship in respect of the lower price.

That's personal choice.

The paint will begin peeling off from the masking lines before not too long.

The gloss will start to fade as well as they will have no doubt used cheaper paint and thinners.

High quality paints, thinners and hardners are rather expensive.

But these kinds of problems down the line are to be expected with the cheaper job.

I can tell you for a fact that if I were to have my car repainted to the high specification I would demand, I would pay about

£3,500 in the UK.

I have a friend in Surrey who just had his F348 repainted to a very high specification

(that I advised him on and wrote out the basic repainting spec) and the final bill was

£4,200, which I thought was very good value given the amount of work done and the quality is superb.

Not only that, given reasonable care and protection from the sun, the paint will still look as good in ten years time as the day it rolled out of the bodyshop.

People pays their money and they takes their choice.

That's essentially what this repainting lark boils down to.

There is no such thing as a cheap, high-quality paint job.

Unless, of course, you have a highly skilled car-painter friend who is willing to do it for you as a favour or something.

Regards,
Jim