![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bWMD7oR9oGo
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
A couple more starts from another point of view:
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9pWOG9SrXc8
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![Dancing \:D/](./images/smilies/eusa_dance.gif)
Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members
John145 wrote:What are you trying to show..
.
?
dazzz wrote:I'm no expert but
John145 wrote:100hp difference does make things a tad biased!
dazzz wrote:I'm no expert but
John145 wrote:Detuned as turbo delete? Sorry I don't know the BHP figures for the turbo cars!
dazzz wrote:I'm no expert but
Chloke83 wrote:Turbo vs N/A?
No comparison really, the Turbo would win every time.Numbers do not lie and to say that an N/A would keep up with a Turbo on the track is like claiming you can grow a money tree in your back garden.
![]()
(would be nice though)
Oh and i am not bias as i own and drive an N/A
Lauren wrote:Chloke83 wrote:Turbo vs N/A?
No comparison really, the Turbo would win every time.Numbers do not lie and to say that an N/A would keep up with a Turbo on the track is like claiming you can grow a money tree in your back garden.
![]()
(would be nice though)
Oh and i am not bias as i own and drive an N/A
In the wet, the turbo power advantage would be significantly reduced.
T.F.S. wrote:You are grasping at straws now..
.