





Obviously steel can fail.





Steel is definitely a safer option.


Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members
Jim-SR wrote:
Steel is definitely a safer option.But as I said to begin with, a strut brace is a non-critical component that can fail without any safety consequence.
So it doesn't matter in the slightest!
Jim-SR wrote:I'd go for the steel CDS tube every time.No engineering justification required, its just
"stronger".
If aluminium was in any way suitable then it would be used for roll cages.
Whether it works out stronger vs mass when compared to steel, the fatigue issues will always make steel a safer option.
Obviously steel can fail.But anything can fail by design, production flaws, incorrect material selection
(e.g.
excessive loading for the chosen material), etc.
Steel is definitely a safer option.But as I said to begin with, a strut brace is a non-critical component that can fail without any safety consequence.
So it doesn't matter in the slightest!
scomr2 wrote:Sorry us nerds should just keep quiet and go back to designing cars, mobile phones, computers..
.
and leave you cool types to enjoy the fruit of our labours in blissful ignorance.
PW@Woodsport wrote:As per my posts i'm in the process of making brand new braces, a rear one to start with, i'll post up pics when they are done.
PW@Woodsport wrote:I'd need an SC car here to make a brace for, or an actual SC brace to copy its dimensions.A sunroof front one would be simple enough though.