tubby vs na fuel econnomy

Discussion and technical advice the SW20 MR2. 3S-GTE, 3S-GE, 3S-FE etc
Anything and everything to do with maintenance, modifications and electrical is in here for the Mk2.

Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members

flackie666
Posts: 362
Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2008 12:54 am
Location: Gravesend Kent

tubby vs na fuel econnomy

Post by flackie666 »

as the title says rly any help??
Not So Fast But Just As Furious =]
rossdymond3352
Posts: 1793
Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 1:47 am
Location: Hampshire

Re: tubby vs na fuel econnomy

Post by rossdymond3352 »

If your worried about it, dont buy a turbo :mrgreen:

Turbo = anything from 100miles to a tank to 250 if you drive like a nurse.
mattcambs
Posts: 2308
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 9:59 pm
Location: Saffron Walden, Essex

Re: tubby vs na fuel econnomy

Post by mattcambs »

N/A beats Turbo.

Hope that helps.

I get 32mpg from my rev 3 turbo, but that's because I do 75% of my mileage at a steady 70mph. Equates to about 280 miles per tank (well, 40 litres to fill back up anyway)
flackie666
Posts: 362
Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2008 12:54 am
Location: Gravesend Kent

Re: tubby vs na fuel econnomy

Post by flackie666 »

tbh im not that worried about it i use my bike more than the car so it would be a toy i was just wondering :thumleft: just to see if i will be able to get insured on one :lol:
Not So Fast But Just As Furious =]
leeandjude
Posts: 159
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 8:15 pm
Location: sunderland, tyne and wear

Re: tubby vs na fuel econnomy

Post by leeandjude »

im getting about 110 miles for 15 quid or 70 miles for a tenner. better than my v6 petrol shogun! that does 13mpg! :shock:
Martian_333
Posts: 713
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 11:36 pm
Location: Midlands

Re: tubby vs na fuel econnomy

Post by Martian_333 »

TBH the mpg will be the least of your worries, but its all in the right foot, I have had 250 miles out of the tank pretty regular, using it as a everyday car off boost to work/back.
Peter C
Posts: 1635
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 9:17 am
Location: Beaconsfield, Buckinghamshire

Re: tubby vs na fuel econnomy

Post by Peter C »

REPOST!!!!
ancient mariner
Posts: 1793
Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2006 2:22 pm
Location: STOKE-ON-TRENT

Re: tubby vs na fuel econnomy

Post by ancient mariner »

Peter C wrote:REPOST!!!!


might be a repost peter,but the way things are,if reposts are deleted,we will be down to the barebones on new posts :lol: .also the search facility isn't the easiest to use.paul.
Mr2_NA
Posts: 973
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 6:47 pm
Location: Isle of Man

Re: tubby vs na fuel econnomy

Post by Mr2_NA »

rarely get 200 to a tank on my NA - No Lambda sensor. HaHa. Just make sure it has one.
thebody
Posts: 455
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 5:13 pm
Location: scunthorpe

Re: tubby vs na fuel econnomy

Post by thebody »

leeandjude wrote:im getting about 110 miles for 15 quid or 70 miles for a tenner. better than my v6 petrol shogun! that does 13mpg! :shock:

Is that in a tubby :shock:
I get 50 miles for a tenner town driving
Andytoyota
Posts: 208
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 3:19 pm
Location: Somerset

Re: tubby vs na fuel econnomy

Post by Andytoyota »

Not being funny but must depend on the condition of the engine in some respects, i can fill my tubby up and drive half the tank booting it around at 17psi and the other half motorway driving and still see 250 miles to a tank, had nearly 300 miles mostly motorway driving before!
starmist
Posts: 140
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 5:29 pm
Location: Staffs

Re: tubby vs na fuel econnomy

Post by starmist »

I just got exactly 35mpg on a full tank in my turbo, no town driving just good clear fast A roads. Or about 20mpg around town and local driving.
leeandjude
Posts: 159
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 8:15 pm
Location: sunderland, tyne and wear

Re: tubby vs na fuel econnomy

Post by leeandjude »

thebody wrote:
leeandjude wrote:im getting about 110 miles for 15 quid or 70 miles for a tenner. better than my v6 petrol shogun! that does 13mpg! :shock:

Is that in a tubby :shock:
I get 50 miles for a tenner town driving


no its just an N/A. but im still surprised i get that much around town. thats nearly fiesta mpg! dont really boot it much now anyway, just enjoying having the t tops off in the weather! :D
ancient mariner
Posts: 1793
Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2006 2:22 pm
Location: STOKE-ON-TRENT

Re: tubby vs na fuel econnomy

Post by ancient mariner »

don't think of miles (per gallon)
think of smiles per mile,if you are considering a turbo :lol: .paul.
thebody
Posts: 455
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 5:13 pm
Location: scunthorpe

Re: tubby vs na fuel econnomy

Post by thebody »

leeandjude wrote:
thebody wrote:
leeandjude wrote:im getting about 110 miles for 15 quid or 70 miles for a tenner. better than my v6 petrol shogun! that does 13mpg! :shock:

Is that in a tubby :shock:
I get 50 miles for a tenner town driving


no its just an N/A. but im still surprised i get that much around town. thats nearly fiesta mpg! dont really boot it much now anyway, just enjoying having the t tops off in the weather! :D

Thats becuase the N/A is about the same speed as a fiesta :lol:
Mr Two
Posts: 1457
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2005 6:55 pm
Location: Stoke on Trent

Re: tubby vs na fuel econnomy

Post by Mr Two »

I've owned both and the N/A was better on mpg than my tubby, BUT it wasn't as much fun to drive :lol: :mrgreen: \:D/
However, as said previously, it's all about the right foot, or not, as the case may be. Drive the tubby "sensibly" through the gears etc and you will get enough mpg out of her so that when you want to "kick" that turbo in :mrgreen: you don't have to worry :lol: \:D/ :thumleft:
redmr89
Posts: 1002
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 2:18 pm
Location: newcastle

Re: tubby vs na fuel econnomy

Post by redmr89 »

if your after miles per gallon get a small kia. my neighbour is always going on about it when im washing my car. 70mpg..... like i care. i drive a turbo cos i like the punch, i wish it was economical, but it isnt. i know this doesnt answer your question but na versus turbo is not a good comparison. na mr2's are still quick and are more economical but drive a turbo and you will understand why we sacrifice fuel economy.
Goto10
Posts: 3012
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 1:33 pm
Location: Essex
Contact:

Re: tubby vs na fuel econnomy

Post by Goto10 »

Just filled up, I managed 265 miles from the previous tankful (gen3 tubby), this included lots of spirited driving, about 50 miles on a motorway and a fair bit of town driving. Good enough for me!
rossdymond3352
Posts: 1793
Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 1:47 am
Location: Hampshire

Re: tubby vs na fuel econnomy

Post by rossdymond3352 »

I just managed to get 280 from £40 @ 102.9p a litre on v-power on a long journey however i kicked its ar$e on almost every roundabout and junction and 50odd miles was towns...i was surprised to say the least as the tank wasnt even brim full....and its rev1 engine running breathing mods ARC IC and a bit more boost! :thumleft:
RobCrezz
Posts: 1509
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 10:16 am
Location: Essex

Re: tubby vs na fuel econnomy

Post by RobCrezz »

I got 300miles to a tank once. :oops:
Post Reply

Return to “MR2 MK2 1990 - 1999 NA & Turbo”