Exhaust performance - Japspeed vs Mongoose

Discussion and technical advice the SW20 MR2. 3S-GTE, 3S-GE, 3S-FE etc
Anything and everything to do with maintenance, modifications and electrical is in here for the Mk2.

Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members

androo007
Posts: 2363
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2014 1:43 pm

Exhaust performance - Japspeed vs Mongoose

Post by androo007 »

Hi guys

Watch out....anal warning.....

I currently have the Japspeed exhaust on my turbo, and although I like it, I think the rest of the world doesn't.

I have a mongoose exhaust in the shed in really good condition, so tempted to swap over.

Both systems are 3" inlet, mongoose slightly smaller outlet.

I'm running external wastegated turbo.

Now I may well be wrong, but with the bigger silencers on the mongoose, could this cause a drop in power with the increased baffling? Assuming the Japspeed is the most free flowing as it's just wallop straight out, could it be offering more power than a mongoose?

Hard to say without back to back dynos for sure.

Im tempted to say NO on the basis I have a screamer pipe, so surely any extra back pressure created is non void by the screamer anyway?

What's your thoughts, geeks?
SonicSW20
Posts: 3681
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 7:54 pm

Re: Exhaust performance - Japspeed vs Mongoose

Post by SonicSW20 »

Not going to make any difference in a stock turbo.
androo007
Posts: 2363
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2014 1:43 pm

Re: Exhaust performance - Japspeed vs Mongoose

Post by androo007 »

It's not a stock turbo though. Td06 20g. Looking to map at 20-21psi so flow is something to consider.
C35Rob
Posts: 2108
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 1:14 am
Location: Gateshead

Re: Exhaust performance - Japspeed vs Mongoose

Post by C35Rob »

Without doing back to back dyno tests you're only going to be guessing. But based on the facts that japspeed is the cheapest exhaust you can get, made in China from low quality materials with no consideration for performance and mongoose is a reputable, quality product I'd choose the mongoose every time.
EX MR2 owner, currently on a '00 Honda CBR600 Follow me on Instagram @c35rob
androo007
Posts: 2363
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2014 1:43 pm

Re: Exhaust performance - Japspeed vs Mongoose

Post by androo007 »

Yeah, I did wonder that. Although sometimes you do get good results from these cheap exhausts. Back in the day I had I think at one point the UK NA record for a hyundai cope and dyno tests got the best results with.....the cheapest XS power exhaust
craig
Posts: 43936
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 3:44 am

Re: Exhaust performance - Japspeed vs Mongoose

Post by craig »

No question mate, the Mongoose is a quality product, the Japspeed, a readily available, mass produced, cheap exhaust. Nothing wrong with it though, it does what it says on the tin.

If I had a Mongoose sat in my garage, the JS would be up for sale.

Only way to prove, is to do back to back dyno's with both fitted. I wouldn't need dyno tests to do that though, I'd cut out the middle man and fit the Mongoose. :mrgreen:
androo007
Posts: 2363
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2014 1:43 pm

Re: Exhaust performance - Japspeed vs Mongoose

Post by androo007 »

Sold! Thanks guys :thumleft:

Maybe I'll keep the JS for another day. You're right Craig they look great and do sound cool but I live in an elderly area and think the curtains are twitching and neighbourhood watch meeting agendas being written..... :roll:
2mad
Posts: 5983
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 12:11 pm
Location: uk

Re: Exhaust performance - Japspeed vs Mongoose

Post by 2mad »

mongoose is 70mm pipework and crapspeed is 76mm .. i had a mongoose and it produces a heavy bass tone on tick over .. sat in the car it seems quiet if i went in the house while the car was warming up my god the place was shaking with a bass boom, this did not make me popular 8-[

Crapspeed is also very loud from imoc member accounts =;


Anyhoo not very neighbour friendly was where i was going with this post :eye:
craig
Posts: 43936
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 3:44 am

Re: Exhaust performance - Japspeed vs Mongoose

Post by craig »

Not sure on the Japspeed being loud.

Mine is coupled with a berk decat and its no louder than any other aftermarket turbo exhaust.

I also did 1650 miles round the Pyrenees this year and it didn't drone or do mine or the missus' heads in.
CalMac
Posts: 1747
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 7:08 pm
Location: Northampton

Re: Exhaust performance - Japspeed vs Mongoose

Post by CalMac »

Screw the neighbours! As long as you're not sitting revving the boobs off it at 6am on a Monday morning then you're not being unreasonable. The car has passed an MOT therefore they can just deal with it :mrgreen:

Another vote for the Mongoose though. I run a Phoenix Power and that's pretty quiet but a bit of a mission to find :-k
2mad
Posts: 5983
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 12:11 pm
Location: uk

Re: Exhaust performance - Japspeed vs Mongoose

Post by 2mad »

CalMac wrote:Screw the neighbours! As long as you're not sitting revving the boobs off it at 6am on a Monday morning then you're not being unreasonable. The car has passed an MOT therefore they can just deal with it :mrgreen:

Another vote for the Mongoose though. I run a Phoenix Power and that's pretty quiet but a bit of a mission to find :-k



Funny you mention mot .. my friend runs a garage and booked my car in at a mot testers .. and the chap said it exceeded noise levels or some sh/t but passed it because it was my friend ... just saying 8-[ ... maybe im getting old my first car had a cherry bomb on it lol .. yeah sod the neighbours lol
androo007
Posts: 2363
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2014 1:43 pm

Re: Exhaust performance - Japspeed vs Mongoose

Post by androo007 »

So I got the mongoose out today and...

It is a 3" pipe... up to the downpipe. It's then stepped down to a 2.5" on the 3 bolt flange.

My downpipe is 100% a 3" so now unsure.

The step is only a couple of inches but in theory would be a restriction, right?

Or..... is it even of concern as I have the screamer pipe anyway?

Normally I would not be bothered and it'd be easy decision, but I want to make sure I get every hp available without upping boost!
2mad
Posts: 5983
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 12:11 pm
Location: uk

Re: Exhaust performance - Japspeed vs Mongoose

Post by 2mad »

androo007 wrote:So I got the mongoose out today and...

It is a 3" pipe... up to the downpipe. It's then stepped down to a 2.5" on the 3 bolt flange.

My downpipe is 100% a 3" so now unsure.

The step is only a couple of inches but in theory would be a restriction, right?

Or..... is it even of concern as I have the screamer pipe anyway?

Normally I would not be bothered and it'd be easy decision, but I want to make sure I get every hp available without upping boost!



I remembered the step , thought it was 70mm #-o .. if you running a screamer you will be fine .. thats alot of gas the exhaust does not have to deal with .. you could get the step removed from the b-pipe if you know a fabricator :thumleft:
Martin F
IMOC Moderator
Posts: 14822
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 1:19 pm
Location: The Couch !

Re: Exhaust performance - Japspeed vs Mongoose

Post by Martin F »

I would keep the japspeed on, looks better, Imo sounds better and I doubt very much at your power levels there will be any difference between the two.....
Especially as you are using a screamer pipe, takes some pressure off the exhaust system... :thumleft:
gnzyza
Posts: 1300
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 11:39 am
Location: Gloucester

Re: Exhaust performance - Japspeed vs Mongoose

Post by gnzyza »

Japspeed , very uncomfortable around 3k, or it could be poly engine mounts or both.

Anyone with this exhaust and not running poly mounts find it drones at 3k?
C35Rob
Posts: 2108
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 1:14 am
Location: Gateshead

Re: Exhaust performance - Japspeed vs Mongoose

Post by C35Rob »

androo007 wrote:So I got the mongoose out today and...

It is a 3" pipe... up to the downpipe. It's then stepped down to a 2.5" on the 3 bolt flange.

My downpipe is 100% a 3" so now unsure.

The step is only a couple of inches but in theory would be a restriction, right?

Or..... is it even of concern as I have the screamer pipe anyway?

Normally I would not be bothered and it'd be easy decision, but I want to make sure I get every hp available without upping boost!


I mentioned this (2.5" being a restriction) to my dyno operator when I took my car to the rollers, I was unconvinced but he said its nothing to worry about, and he's built 500bhp evos that run 2.5" exhausts

the area of a 3"/76mm pipe is 45.36 CM2, the area of a 2.5"/63mm pipe is 31.17 CM2, but if you have a 38mm screamer pipe the area of that is 11.34 CM2 so 42.51CM2 total - very little difference compares to a 3" exhaust with a plumbed back dump pipe, probably better anyway since you don't have the two different flows converging

there's a B2B dyno sheet here from KO racing

http://www.koracing.net/viewarticle.php?article=7

which shows very little real-world difference between the two
EX MR2 owner, currently on a '00 Honda CBR600 Follow me on Instagram @c35rob
androo007
Posts: 2363
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2014 1:43 pm

Re: Exhaust performance - Japspeed vs Mongoose

Post by androo007 »

Wow what an answer! Cheers Rob :thumleft:
mrfil13
Posts: 1102
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 7:18 pm
Location: Cambridge (ish)

Re: Exhaust performance - Japspeed vs Mongoose

Post by mrfil13 »

In a similar predicament to yourself, i have a PP Dep 2 Std on the car, sounds really nice and ear friendly on a motorway. It sounds/looks like the y section is starting to go. I could get it repaired but there's a crack in one of the tailpipes.

I also have a Japspeed in the garage.

Choices are either get the Dep2 repaired although i've not found anywhere near cambridge yet or potentially get one of the apexi exhaust valve style things but not sure if they can be fit without modification. Yet to find any examples of people installing the valves on a MR2 though.

My Japspeed had bungs that i could bolt onto the tailpipes, looked abit naff but did help alot.

Alternative i was considering was finding somewhere that could replace the japspeed mufflers with something much bigger.
benjo
Posts: 284
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 11:40 pm
Location: Under your bed

Re: Exhaust performance - Japspeed vs Mongoose

Post by benjo »

I run a fujitsubo legalis r on a n/a I've had complaints
That it rattles the windows of man across the road!!!
But since he's a pr@&k I don't care
Told him he should ov bought better quality Windows as mine
Don't rattle \:D/
Too weird to live, to rare to die
alanmr2turbo
Posts: 2238
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 7:08 pm
Location: Birmingham
Contact:

Re: Exhaust performance - Japspeed vs Mongoose

Post by alanmr2turbo »

gnzyza wrote:Japspeed , very uncomfortable around 3k, or it could be poly engine mounts or both.

Anyone with this exhaust and not running poly mounts find it drones at 3k?


I have Japspeed and poly engine mounts. It does drone a little at a certain rev range but then i just turn up my stereo up which is running 2 x 12" subs so I dont hear any engine noise LOL
Post Reply

Return to “MR2 MK2 1990 - 1999 NA & Turbo”