![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
Considering swapping from Carbotech to Porterfield pads, not because of stopping power, purely because of the amount of corrosive dust the Carbotechs create.
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![Anxious 8-[](./images/smilies/eusa_shifty.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
So looking at the Porterfield options trying to choose a suitable candidate, and the only real comparison I can find is the following graph from Porterfield showing relative friction levels:
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![Image](http://i354.photobucket.com/albums/r420/fomoashman333/Porterfield_zpsf1oz6hdb.jpg)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
Now the dumb bit! I seem to remember that the higher to coefficient of friction, the higher the level of friction.
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
Obviously this ignores the additional heat created by higher friction- but trying to be simple: does higher friction mean better braking?
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
In which case why are their seemingly most popular pads
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
Wouldn't the R41 be a better choice, although I can see their effectiveness only ramps up once they get hot!
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
So.
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)