Has anyone else found a tubby can be very eco friendly?

Discussion and technical advice the SW20 MR2. 3S-GTE, 3S-GE, 3S-FE etc
Anything and everything to do with maintenance, modifications and electrical is in here for the Mk2.

Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members

samgpr50
Posts: 519
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2013 5:46 pm
Location: Alsager

Has anyone else found a tubby can be very eco friendly?

Post by samgpr50 »

So I'm out tonight doing a trip I do everyday and it usually costs £10 for about 40 miles which is fine with me normally.

Well on the way there I got stuck behind lots of traffic so no boost used at all. Then on the way home I decided to take it extra careful and when I got home I had only used half the amount of fuel I normally would!

It's always good when it's saving money and I know that's not what these cars are about but my BMW would never do that well no matter how I drove it. :mrgreen:

Sam
Peter Gidden
IMOC Affiliated Trackday Organiser
Posts: 10506
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 9:49 am
Location: South Yorkshire

Re: Has anyone else found a tubby can be very eco friendly?

Post by Peter Gidden »

A turbocharged car will on average, only use the petrol of an n/a version if used like an n/a, i.e. off boost.

I regularly get 35/38 mpg out of my Rev3 Turbo if i drive carefully.
Ryan S
IMOC Moderator
Posts: 10902
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2005 1:32 pm
Location: Bonnie Dundee
Contact:

Re: Has anyone else found a tubby can be very eco friendly?

Post by Ryan S »

yeah man, on a long trip i use my low boost setting, got from Dundee to Edinburgh and back off £15, whatever that is in litres :thumleft:
Peter Gidden
IMOC Affiliated Trackday Organiser
Posts: 10506
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 9:49 am
Location: South Yorkshire

Re: Has anyone else found a tubby can be very eco friendly?

Post by Peter Gidden »

I drive to work and back and often don't boost at all! :oops:
RST
Posts: 2889
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 1:02 pm
Location: Inverness, Scotland

Re: Has anyone else found a tubby can be very eco friendly?

Post by RST »

I never considered the 3SGE or GTE that bad if driven sensibly. I think if you service them often and keep what I call a "clean fuel regime" then they are decent enough on mpg / miles per tank compared to other marques.

I know folk who've opted for new cars on the mpg and tax argument but when you take in all the factors the 3S doesn't really do that unfavourably. I'm still of the opinion if you want to save the planet you keep a decent older car going than regularly keep buying new.

90% of it is how you drive though!
Gullzter
Posts: 2844
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 1:04 am
Location: Glasgow

Re: Has anyone else found a tubby can be very eco friendly?

Post by Gullzter »

Well comparing it to my v6 2.8 golf the rev3 tubby was better most times although i boost quite alot, hell it was better than my old golf 1.8 non turbo aswell come to think of it!
pistol pete
Posts: 7068
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 5:47 pm

Re: Has anyone else found a tubby can be very eco friendly?

Post by pistol pete »

Gullzter wrote:Well comparing it to my v6 2.8 golf the rev3 tubby was better most times although i boost quite alot, hell it was better than my old golf 1.8 non turbo aswell come to think of it!


the 4motion is not what you would call planet friendly on petrol...
MR2 Rich
Posts: 1582
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2012 1:18 pm
Location: Harrogate North Yorkshire

Re: Has anyone else found a tubby can be very eco friendly?

Post by MR2 Rich »

I can sees single figure mpg on mine! :mrgreen:
No 2 :(
pistol pete
Posts: 7068
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 5:47 pm

Re: Has anyone else found a tubby can be very eco friendly?

Post by pistol pete »

took my focus st for a test run after its remap and other goodies..
i averaged 3.2mpg :thumleft:
l1ca
Posts: 713
Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2013 10:17 am

Re: Has anyone else found a tubby can be very eco friendly?

Post by l1ca »

Ive a Rev 3 Turbo, and a 51 plate laguna 1.8 petrol estate as my daily bus, combined in the laguna I get around 37 - 40 which is by no means bad, but when I drive the Mr2 conservatively Its noticeably not that far off the lagunas figure
Gullzter
Posts: 2844
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 1:04 am
Location: Glasgow

Re: Has anyone else found a tubby can be very eco friendly?

Post by Gullzter »

pistol pete wrote:took my focus st for a test run after its remap and other goodies..
i averaged 3.2mpg :thumleft:


:sick:
Marf
Posts: 6728
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 4:56 pm
Location: West Sussex

Re: Has anyone else found a tubby can be very eco friendly?

Post by Marf »

Either I had a heavy right foot or my Tubby was not right somehow. I could only ever manage 26mpg on the commute and the best I ever got from it was 32mpg on a long motorway run :-k
Gullzter
Posts: 2844
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 1:04 am
Location: Glasgow

Re: Has anyone else found a tubby can be very eco friendly?

Post by Gullzter »

I guess everyones car is different, take into consideration weight, fuel used, engine health, sensors, mods etc
synXero
Posts: 3781
Joined: Fri May 28, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: London, Edinburgh, or the Highlands!

Re: Has anyone else found a tubby can be very eco friendly?

Post by synXero »

I reckon people diddle their figures sometimes too :eye:

I recorded all my fuel usage on the Beams on that Road Trip iPhone app. There were highs of over 40mpg across a tank down to about 22mpg at a low.

The Corvette is working out about 5mpg down on either figure across a tank. Best I've seen is 30 to a tank, worst 18. The problem is I can't resist driving it like a knob :lol:
Magic Beans
Posts: 4789
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 1:01 pm
Contact:

Re: Has anyone else found a tubby can be very eco friendly?

Post by Magic Beans »

The best I ever got was mid to high 20's, even when driving ultra casual. I dread to think what it did on boost :shock:
synXero
Posts: 3781
Joined: Fri May 28, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: London, Edinburgh, or the Highlands!

Re: Has anyone else found a tubby can be very eco friendly?

Post by synXero »

Off boost? Was it cammed or anything?

What does westlife get in terms of efficiency?
Magic Beans
Posts: 4789
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 1:01 pm
Contact:

Re: Has anyone else found a tubby can be very eco friendly?

Post by Magic Beans »

synXero wrote:Off boost? Was it cammed or anything?

What does westlife get in terms of efficiency?


Standard cams with optimised timings and a block bored to take 87mm pistons.

I have no clue what the Westy does. I don't know how big the tank is and it doesn't have a fuel gauge. I basically shake it a bit when it's parked and listen to how much it sloshes :lol: I am adding one though, along with a few other bits to make it less of a hillclimber and more of a normal car.
Ryan S
IMOC Moderator
Posts: 10902
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2005 1:32 pm
Location: Bonnie Dundee
Contact:

Re: Has anyone else found a tubby can be very eco friendly?

Post by Ryan S »

synXero wrote:Off boost? Was it cammed or anything?

What does westlife get in terms of efficiency?



probably not al ot considering they cut about on private jets :D
uglee
Posts: 934
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2004 12:38 pm
Location: Ayrshire

Re: Has anyone else found a tubby can be very eco friendly?

Post by uglee »

Maybe not scientific but 3 of us brimmed our cars in Elgin and drove together for 200 miles at the same pace. Mine was the only turbo but according to the gauge it had used considerably less fuel. Maybe to do with gearing, the n/a is quite busy at motorway speeds.
samgpr50
Posts: 519
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2013 5:46 pm
Location: Alsager

Re: Has anyone else found a tubby can be very eco friendly?

Post by samgpr50 »

Magic Beans wrote:
synXero wrote:Off boost? Was it cammed or anything?

What does westlife get in terms of efficiency?


Standard cams with optimised timings and a block bored to take 87mm pistons.

I have no clue what the Westy does. I don't know how big the tank is and it doesn't have a fuel gauge. I basically shake it a bit when it's parked and listen to how much it sloshes :lol: I am adding one though, along with a few other bits to make it less of a hillclimber and more of a normal car.



I love the idea of this! Also I can't imagine your 2 would have been good on fuel after reading the build thread! :mrgreen:

Sam
Post Reply

Return to “MR2 MK2 1990 - 1999 NA & Turbo”