tin top vs. moonroof - chassis stiffness and weight

Discussion and technical advice the SW20 MR2. 3S-GTE, 3S-GE, 3S-FE etc
Anything and everything to do with maintenance, modifications and electrical is in here for the Mk2.

Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members

Post Reply
jasongtr
Posts: 4583
Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2009 7:55 pm
Location: normally under a car

tin top vs. moonroof - chassis stiffness and weight

Post by jasongtr »

whats the difference between the two?

my V6 is a sunroof/moonroof model, its a rev1 (for what its worth) with no power steering or abs)

is the tin top noticeably stiffer or not, i appreciate if i were to swap the stuff over to a tin tin top shell its a lot of work so is it worth it?

I am also aware that any weight saved over losing the sunroof will be lost if i got a car with power steering and abs. so i guess the main question is the chassis stiffness. the currently has a std front brace (useless i guess) and no rear brace, these i know will need to be added.
shibby!
Posts: 2747
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 8:48 pm
Location: Kirkcaldy, Fife

Re: tin top vs. moonroof - chassis stiffness and weight

Post by shibby! »

i noticed a difference between tintop and t bar.

Cant comment on moonroof.
jasongtr
Posts: 4583
Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2009 7:55 pm
Location: normally under a car

Re: tin top vs. moonroof - chassis stiffness and weight

Post by jasongtr »

i can imagine that one, but i cant see as there would be much in the moonroof/tin top as the front and rear screens are still connected
jimGTS
Posts: 14024
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: North Kent

Re: tin top vs. moonroof - chassis stiffness and weight

Post by jimGTS »

am not sure how true this is....

however the rev5 brouche i got off flashharry states hardtop as 1270kg and the tbar as 1380kg....(turbo model)

im not quite sure if there is actually that much difference, seems a bit extreme to me....

:? :?

ill have another look, but thats rev5 weights!!!
id imagine the rev1/2 maybe slightly lighter with no abs, side impact bars and all that business..
jasongtr
Posts: 4583
Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2009 7:55 pm
Location: normally under a car

Re: tin top vs. moonroof - chassis stiffness and weight

Post by jasongtr »

i would hope to get my rev1 moonroof with no abs or ps, and light weight seats/wheels down to 1150 if possible - without going extreme or spending silly money on carbon parts
JohnnyC
Posts: 7001
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 10:25 pm
Location: West Yorkshire

Re: tin top vs. moonroof - chassis stiffness and weight

Post by JohnnyC »

jimGTS wrote:however the rev5 brouche i got off flashharry states hardtop as 1270kg and the tbar as 1380kg....(turbo model)

Just to compare, the UK rev5 brochure has 1285kg for the moonroof, and 1310kg for the t-bar.
Image
jasongtr
Posts: 4583
Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2009 7:55 pm
Location: normally under a car

Re: tin top vs. moonroof - chassis stiffness and weight

Post by jasongtr »

any idea what a rev1 moonroof weighs
matt-mr2
Posts: 1259
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:33 pm
Location: barnsley

Re: tin top vs. moonroof - chassis stiffness and weight

Post by matt-mr2 »

there is no mention of if its tin top/sunroof
Toyota MR2 - MKII N/A (1989 - 1991)

Dimensions:
Length: 4170mm
Width: 1700mm
Height: 1240mm
Wheel Base = 2400mm
Front Track = 1470mm
Rear Track = 1450mm
Ground Clearance: 135mm
Coefficient of drag: 0.310
Weight: 1210kg
%Weight on front wheels: 42%


http://www.megaboost.co.uk/mr2/frames/t ... .htm#mk2na
jasongtr
Posts: 4583
Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2009 7:55 pm
Location: normally under a car

Re: tin top vs. moonroof - chassis stiffness and weight

Post by jasongtr »

well if thats the case i should see 1100 kgs maybe, great thanks for that
fishy89
Posts: 26
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2010 10:22 am
Location: Sandy, Bedfordshire

Re: tin top vs. moonroof - chassis stiffness and weight

Post by fishy89 »

jasongtr wrote:i would hope to get my rev1 moonroof with no abs or ps, and light weight seats/wheels down to 1150 if possible - without going extreme or spending silly money on carbon parts


you have got a v6 though mate... thatll add a fair chunk of weight..
jasongtr
Posts: 4583
Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2009 7:55 pm
Location: normally under a car

Re: tin top vs. moonroof - chassis stiffness and weight

Post by jasongtr »

apparently they are not that much heavier, ill see when it goes on the weighbridge in a few weeks - to give me starting point
fishy89
Posts: 26
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2010 10:22 am
Location: Sandy, Bedfordshire

Re: tin top vs. moonroof - chassis stiffness and weight

Post by fishy89 »

ahhh if not then thats awesome!

yeh get it on the weigh bridge :D
toxo
IMOC Committee
Posts: 11345
Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 5:41 pm
Location: The Toast Aisle
Contact:

Re: tin top vs. moonroof - chassis stiffness and weight

Post by toxo »

It's almost completely irrelevant to your question but my MK2 turbo rev3 (Power Steering, tintop, ICE) with half a tank of fuel and me in it came out at 1410kg. I reckon I'm 70-80kg and half a tank of fuel is about 20kg.

Remember the weights that manufacturers quote are usually dry weights.
Last edited by toxo on Tue Oct 26, 2010 10:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
IMOC-UK - the only club to win 'Best Club Stand' at JAE more than once, and twice in a row!
jasongtr
Posts: 4583
Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2009 7:55 pm
Location: normally under a car

Re: tin top vs. moonroof - chassis stiffness and weight

Post by jasongtr »

BLIMEY :shock: those abs sensors must be at least 10kgs each though :mrgreen:

ah well ill see in a few weeks when its taxed and road ready
toxo
IMOC Committee
Posts: 11345
Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 5:41 pm
Location: The Toast Aisle
Contact:

Re: tin top vs. moonroof - chassis stiffness and weight

Post by toxo »

Meh I'm a tit, my car doesn't have ABS at all :lol: updated my post above.
IMOC-UK - the only club to win 'Best Club Stand' at JAE more than once, and twice in a row!
jasongtr
Posts: 4583
Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2009 7:55 pm
Location: normally under a car

Re: tin top vs. moonroof - chassis stiffness and weight

Post by jasongtr »

ah must be them super doopah lead speakers you have then
jimGTS
Posts: 14024
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: North Kent

Re: tin top vs. moonroof - chassis stiffness and weight

Post by jimGTS »

jasongtr wrote:well if thats the case i should see 1100 kgs maybe, great thanks for that


i wouldnt be suprised you coming back to this thread and telling us it weighs 1300kg to be honest, lol

what have you lost to think your around 1100kg?
jasongtr
Posts: 4583
Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2009 7:55 pm
Location: normally under a car

Re: tin top vs. moonroof - chassis stiffness and weight

Post by jasongtr »

not much as yet but i wanted the weight done. Then i can calculate as i go
Torero
Posts: 1578
Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2008 11:33 pm
Location: Westminster, London
Contact:

Re: tin top vs. moonroof - chassis stiffness and weight

Post by Torero »

jasongtr wrote:is the tin top noticeably stiffer or not, i appreciate if i were to swap the stuff over to a tin tin top shell its a lot of work so is it worth it?
Jason, according to Terry Heick's book the sunroof version is stiffer than the tin top as the reinforcing struts and additional crossmembers in the roof add more rigidity.

Makes sense.
jasongtr
Posts: 4583
Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2009 7:55 pm
Location: normally under a car

Re: tin top vs. moonroof - chassis stiffness and weight

Post by jasongtr »

ah thanks for that, heavier though i guess
Post Reply

Return to “MR2 MK2 1990 - 1999 NA & Turbo”