![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
Now am sure if they were that good and had no down sides the 99% of people would have them, but they seem quite a rare conversion still.
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
Could anyone share advice or knowlodge ln this?
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![thumleft :thumleft:](./images/smilies/icon_thumleft.gif)
Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members
loudandproud205 wrote:Very good points hence why my thread, I am looking in to why it may have failed, but I would belive that my car and the sensor being 21 years old can't have helped, and if it due to the age of the car or age of the sensor as it's not really possible to try a newer 2nd hand one as the later revs were different and stomaching£150 each time while possibly trying to source the fault is a bit hard to justify.
![]()
Thanks for your help and input on be matter
simpson_eh wrote:i went through 3 toyota sensors before i realised my piston 3 was trashed
found out on a leak down test, when they took it out there was no metal gaps between the rings lol