[Mk2] [Turbo] Compression ratios and head gaskets

Posts about anything do to with modifying your car such as fitting aftermarket parts, bodykit, or tuning the engine for more performance.

Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members

gavinda
Posts: 408
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 12:20 am
Location: leeds

Re: [Mk2] [Turbo] Compression ratios and head gaskets

Post by gavinda »

Peter Gidden - SBITS wrote:
MR2 Rich wrote:
bobhatton wrote:

Because by adding high octane fuel or installing lower compression pistons the engines then start to perform the way they should do, See jimGTS post above.


Still waiting for some evidence that lowering the compression ratio makes a engine perform better...


What do you mean by evidence?

Will Garrett's word do?

http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbobyga ... with_boost


you are taking what he is saying out of context, he is suggesting properly intercooled mr2s are not retarding ignition from knock (as they are not overly knocking) and so will perform better then at lower CR, he is merely asking for back to back dyno or some other evidence of the low C/R vehicles vs stock C/R

he is in agreement with garrett quote 'Generally, compression ratio should be set as high as feasible without encountering detonation at the maximum load condition'
Marf
Posts: 6728
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 4:56 pm
Location: West Sussex

Re: [Mk2] [Turbo] Compression ratios and head gaskets

Post by Marf »

How will a simple dyno run tell you that the ignition is being retarded?
bobhatton
Posts: 3351
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 9:34 pm
Location: Bodmin Cornwall

Re: [Mk2] [Turbo] Compression ratios and head gaskets

Post by bobhatton »

MR2 Rich wrote:
bobhatton wrote:
MR2 Rich wrote:

How do you know they are all running on the knock sensor?


Because by adding high octane fuel or installing lower compression pistons the engines then start to perform the way they should do, See jimGTS post above.


Still waiting for some evidence that lowering the compression ratio makes a engine perform better...


Having the right compression ratio for the fuel and boost being used so the ECU is not running under the control of the knock sensor will make the engine perform as it was designed, this is all common sense something I think you lack.
Designer for turbo set ups on F1 cars, and Nitrous Oxide Systems of the USA in the 80s
bobhatton
Posts: 3351
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 9:34 pm
Location: Bodmin Cornwall

Re: [Mk2] [Turbo] Compression ratios and head gaskets

Post by bobhatton »

gavinda wrote:in regards to engine knock,preignition. The cooler intake air lowers in
cylinder gas temperatures at the end of the compression stroke. Reducing the
gas temperature at the end of a compression stroke reduces knock.

what were your intake air temps on track? chargecoolers tend to be less effective for longer durations of wide open throttle depending on if the system is large enough.


The lower the inlet temperature the more volume of air there will be in the inlet. So under compression there will be more air to compress, this will give a higher pressure and a higher temperature
Designer for turbo set ups on F1 cars, and Nitrous Oxide Systems of the USA in the 80s
jon
Posts: 341
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 10:23 am
Location: Cambridge

Re: [Mk2] [Turbo] Compression ratios and head gaskets

Post by jon »

Image

Data-log of my Rev 3 on the dyno with a stock CT20b turbo, ECU and intercooler running Tesco 99 RON fuel.

Blue line is ignition timing, green line is injector pulse-width. At around 4000 RPM something triggers the ECU to dump extra fuel and rapidly adjust ignition timing.

I haven't figured out the exact trigger yet, but I'll bet it has something to do with the knock sensor....
kev8611
Posts: 503
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2013 12:08 am
Location: Scotland

Re: [Mk2] [Turbo] Compression ratios and head gaskets

Post by kev8611 »

bobhatton wrote:
gavinda wrote:in regards to engine knock,preignition. The cooler intake air lowers in
cylinder gas temperatures at the end of the compression stroke. Reducing the
gas temperature at the end of a compression stroke reduces knock.

what were your intake air temps on track? chargecoolers tend to be less effective for longer durations of wide open throttle depending on if the system is large enough.


The lower the inlet temperature the more volume of air there will be in the inlet. So under compression there will be more air to compress, this will give a higher pressure and a higher temperature


I always thought hotter air has more volume than colder air
Marf
Posts: 6728
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 4:56 pm
Location: West Sussex

Re: [Mk2] [Turbo] Compression ratios and head gaskets

Post by Marf »

kev8611 wrote:
bobhatton wrote:
gavinda wrote:in regards to engine knock,preignition. The cooler intake air lowers in
cylinder gas temperatures at the end of the compression stroke. Reducing the
gas temperature at the end of a compression stroke reduces knock.

what were your intake air temps on track? chargecoolers tend to be less effective for longer durations of wide open throttle depending on if the system is large enough.


The lower the inlet temperature the more volume of air there will be in the inlet. So under compression there will be more air to compress, this will give a higher pressure and a higher temperature


I always thought hotter air has more volume than colder air


You thought wrong.
kev8611
Posts: 503
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2013 12:08 am
Location: Scotland

Re: [Mk2] [Turbo] Compression ratios and head gaskets

Post by kev8611 »

Obviously I did which is why I said it :clap:
Marf
Posts: 6728
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 4:56 pm
Location: West Sussex

Re: [Mk2] [Turbo] Compression ratios and head gaskets

Post by Marf »

:?
jimGTS
Posts: 14024
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: North Kent

Re: [Mk2] [Turbo] Compression ratios and head gaskets

Post by jimGTS »

so we want to run no intercooler then :mrgreen: :eye: :eye:
Marf
Posts: 6728
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 4:56 pm
Location: West Sussex

Re: [Mk2] [Turbo] Compression ratios and head gaskets

Post by Marf »

Replace it with a heating element. :thumleft:
bobhatton
Posts: 3351
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 9:34 pm
Location: Bodmin Cornwall

Re: [Mk2] [Turbo] Compression ratios and head gaskets

Post by bobhatton »

kev8611 wrote:
bobhatton wrote:
gavinda wrote:in regards to engine knock,preignition. The cooler intake air lowers in
cylinder gas temperatures at the end of the compression stroke. Reducing the
gas temperature at the end of a compression stroke reduces knock.

what were your intake air temps on track? chargecoolers tend to be less effective for longer durations of wide open throttle depending on if the system is large enough.


The lower the inlet temperature the more volume of air there will be in the inlet. So under compression there will be more air to compress, this will give a higher pressure and a higher temperature


I always thought hotter air has more volume than colder air


Yes you are right, the hot air has a bigger volume but less weight because it has expanded from the heat.

Colder air has less volume but more weight. The more air by weight that an engine can breath the more power it will give.
Designer for turbo set ups on F1 cars, and Nitrous Oxide Systems of the USA in the 80s
bobhatton
Posts: 3351
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 9:34 pm
Location: Bodmin Cornwall

Re: [Mk2] [Turbo] Compression ratios and head gaskets

Post by bobhatton »

jimGTS wrote:so we want to run no intercooler then :mrgreen: :eye: :eye:


It is all a balance, change one thing and other things change, it is understanding how everything works together.

No intercoolers when I started turbocharging so anything can be done, it is just getting the maximum pressure in the cylinder just before tdc without the temperature going too high and giving detonation.
Designer for turbo set ups on F1 cars, and Nitrous Oxide Systems of the USA in the 80s
MR2 Rich
Posts: 1582
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2012 1:18 pm
Location: Harrogate North Yorkshire

Re: [Mk2] [Turbo] Compression ratios and head gaskets

Post by MR2 Rich »

bobhatton wrote:
MR2 Rich wrote:
bobhatton wrote:

Because by adding high octane fuel or installing lower compression pistons the engines then start to perform the way they should do, See jimGTS post above.


Still waiting for some evidence that lowering the compression ratio makes a engine perform better...


Having the right compression ratio for the fuel and boost being used so the ECU is not running under the control of the knock sensor will make the engine perform as it was designed, this is all common sense something I think you lack.


I have common sense Bob. I just like messing with you. What I don't get is your logic that Toyota designed this engine to run on 100 Ron Japanese fuel and they made it 8.5 compression ratio. You think when using 99 V Power the engine compression ratio needs dropping to 8!
No 2 :(
MR2 Rich
Posts: 1582
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2012 1:18 pm
Location: Harrogate North Yorkshire

Re: [Mk2] [Turbo] Compression ratios and head gaskets

Post by MR2 Rich »

Peter Gidden - SBITS wrote:
MR2 Rich wrote:
bobhatton wrote:

Because by adding high octane fuel or installing lower compression pistons the engines then start to perform the way they should do, See jimGTS post above.


Still waiting for some evidence that lowering the compression ratio makes a engine perform better...


What do you mean by evidence?

Will Garrett's word do?

http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbobyga ... with_boost


Thanks for proving my point Peter. :mrgreen:

"Generally, compression ratio should be set as high as feasible without encountering detonation at the maximum load condition. Compression ratio that is too low will result in an engine that is a bit sluggish in off-boost operation"

"Factors that influence the compression ratio include: fuel anti-knock properties (octane rating), boost pressure, intake air temperature, combustion chamber design, ignition timing, valve events, and exhaust backpressure. Many modern normally-aspirated engines have well-designed combustion chambers that, with appropriate tuning, will allow modest boost levels with no change to compression ratio. For higher power targets with more boost, compression ratio should be adjusted to compensate."
No 2 :(
bobhatton
Posts: 3351
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 9:34 pm
Location: Bodmin Cornwall

Re: [Mk2] [Turbo] Compression ratios and head gaskets

Post by bobhatton »

MR2 Rich wrote:
bobhatton wrote:
MR2 Rich wrote:

Still waiting for some evidence that lowering the compression ratio makes a engine perform better...


Having the right compression ratio for the fuel and boost being used so the ECU is not running under the control of the knock sensor will make the engine perform as it was designed, this is all common sense something I think you lack.


I have common sense Bob. I just like messing with you. What I don't get is your logic that Toyota designed this engine to run on 100 Ron Japanese fuel and they made it 8.5 compression ratio. You think when using 99 V Power the engine compression ratio needs dropping to 8!


Nothing wrong with 8.0:1 compression ratio at all. Would you notice a 1.5% drop in power from 8.5:1?

What is your logic in running a high compression ratio?
Designer for turbo set ups on F1 cars, and Nitrous Oxide Systems of the USA in the 80s
Draven
Posts: 14965
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2006 8:34 am
Location: One of the Hamptons.
Contact:

Re: [Mk2] [Turbo] Compression ratios and head gaskets

Post by Draven »

Ron rating isn't the best way to gauge fuel.. MON is.. Tesco has a 87MON rating which isn't bad. I'm still struggling to find a spec sheel for Vpower or BP Ultimate (rubbish)

On the face of it seems that Tesco 87Mon fuel is the best you can buy in the uk.

For that fact I cannot find any specs for the so called Japanese 100ron fuel.

It seems on lower MON fuels the Knock sensor does a lot of work to prevent pinking. The MR2 does run very rich from the factory and I believe Bob is correct in saying that UK fuel doesn't quite cut it.
MR2 Rich
Posts: 1582
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2012 1:18 pm
Location: Harrogate North Yorkshire

Re: [Mk2] [Turbo] Compression ratios and head gaskets

Post by MR2 Rich »

If you are building a high power engine you would personally drop below 8, wouldn't you? If it was that important why are there no pistons for the 3SGTE that are below 8 and most are 8.5 or 9?
No 2 :(
Marf
Posts: 6728
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 4:56 pm
Location: West Sussex

Re: [Mk2] [Turbo] Compression ratios and head gaskets

Post by Marf »

My first turbo car ran 7.8:1 and 25psi boost, but the car was a homologation special designed to take bolt ons to get big power.
bobhatton
Posts: 3351
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 9:34 pm
Location: Bodmin Cornwall

Re: [Mk2] [Turbo] Compression ratios and head gaskets

Post by bobhatton »

MR2 Rich wrote:If you are building a high power engine you would personally drop below 8, wouldn't you? If it was that important why are there no pistons for the 3SGTE that are below 8 and most are 8.5 or 9?


Pistons are made to any compression needed, you just have to order them.

In the USA the pistons are 8.5:1 and above because racers use high octane fuel, in the EU we have to race on road fuel so piston made in the EU are 8.0:1, just common sense again.
Designer for turbo set ups on F1 cars, and Nitrous Oxide Systems of the USA in the 80s
Post Reply

Return to “Modifications”