allan welsh wrote:lets not spam the guys thread with this v6 v turbo debate. Let him enjoy his car and be gone with the sniping
Top man Welsh.... you're getting old !!
Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members
allan welsh wrote:lets not spam the guys thread with this v6 v turbo debate. Let him enjoy his car and be gone with the sniping
JJ wrote:allan welsh wrote:lets not spam the guys thread with this v6 v turbo debate. Let him enjoy his car and be gone with the sniping
Top man Welsh.... you're getting old !!
Skywalker wrote:a stock v6 will be just as quick as a stock rev 1 turbo
Rubbish!
Skywalker wrote:simply they don't have as much power! end of!
BarronMR wrote:Skywalker wrote:simply they don't have as much power! end of!
But peak power isn't a 100% indicator of how fast a vehicle accellerates its only a very rough guide. Its thats only a snippet of the powerband you use when accelerating...
I don't even believe that a stock rev3, in road conditions would be as quick as the same car powered by a v6. At least thats my opinion from owning both cars.
blue2 wrote:Oh right, for a stock rev 1 turbo I think the fastest ive heard about was 14.6 seconds, correct me if im wrong as ive not checked the database.
blue2 wrote:So the v6 is faster then returning a 14.1 against a 14.2 Yeah agreed this is a debate that will never end. Both are great!
a V6 with a GT30 strapped to it would make a fantastic fast road car I reckon, plenty of displacement to spool it up, i bet the torque curve would be lovely.
vishpish wrote:LOL! nah keep this debate up it rocks!
see if my v6 does a quarter in the 14s id be over the moon you think it should?