Prelude VTEC vs MR2 Turbo Question?

Tales of driving experiences you have had.


Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members

This post is:

Stupid
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 0

Barrie

Prelude VTEC vs MR2 Turbo Question?

Post by Barrie »

I'm looking to swap my Prelude VTEC for a MR2 Turbo, and it seems more than likely that some people here have driven both...

Obviously the Tubby is a lot quicker, but are there any other pros and cons I might want to think about?

(I've got a RWD kitcar thats about 200bhp/ton, so I'm not going to cry that the back end does "dangerous" things...)
matt_mr2t
Posts: 27785
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 3:30 pm
Location: Essex

Re: Prelude VTEC vs MR2 Turbo Question?

Post by matt_mr2t »

Advantages:

Better looking.
Faster.
Rear wheel drive.
More interesting (honda's are just annonymous IMO)

Disadvantages:
No back seats.
Small boot.
Not very good MPG.
Less predicable handling.
Might attract unwanted attention.
nakamura
Posts: 2512
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 2:40 pm
Location: bournemouth

Re: Prelude VTEC vs MR2 Turbo Question?

Post by nakamura »

Prelude handles well.
Sounds better.
More practical.
Looks good.
Bullet proof engine.

MR2 Looks amazing.
Highly tunable.
Tbar option.
Awesome driving postion.
Great handling if unpredictable.
Loads of body tuning options.
Also reliable if looked after.
Cool pop up lights.
Fair sized boot.

The MR2 is certainly a better sports car. I like the prelude a lot but MR2 all the way really. Its the most fun car ive ever driven especially for the money.
C50
Posts: 6405
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 10:31 am
Location: Rhondda Cynon Taff

Re: Prelude VTEC vs MR2 Turbo Question?

Post by C50 »

yep! you'll love it :thumleft:
Spittinflames
Posts: 6685
Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2005 7:07 pm
Location: Staffordshire
Contact:

Re: Prelude VTEC vs MR2 Turbo Question?

Post by Spittinflames »

nakamura wrote:Prelude handles well.
Sounds better.<----- ERRRM COME AGAIN :shock:
More practical.
Looks good.
Bullet proof engine.

MR2 Looks amazing.
Highly tunable.
Tbar option.
Awesome driving postion.
Great handling if unpredictable.
Loads of body tuning options.
Also reliable if looked after.
Cool pop up lights.
Fair sized boot.

The MR2 is certainly a better sports car. I like the prelude a lot but MR2 all the way really. Its the most fun car ive ever driven especially for the money.
skipp123
Posts: 2536
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 9:11 am
Contact:

Re: Prelude VTEC vs MR2 Turbo Question?

Post by skipp123 »

Spittinflames wrote:
nakamura wrote:Prelude handles well.
Sounds better.<----- ERRRM COME AGAIN :shock:
More practical.
Looks good.
Bullet proof engine.

MR2 Looks amazing.
Highly tunable.
Tbar option.
Awesome driving postion.
Great handling if unpredictable.
Loads of body tuning options.
Also reliable if looked after.
Cool pop up lights.
Fair sized boot.

The MR2 is certainly a better sports car. I like the prelude a lot but MR2 all the way really. Its the most fun car ive ever driven especially for the money.


yup do what

http://www.koracing.net/viewclip.php?clip=12

http://www.koracing.net/viewclip.php?clip=13
nakamura
Posts: 2512
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 2:40 pm
Location: bournemouth

Re: Prelude VTEC vs MR2 Turbo Question?

Post by nakamura »

AND?

MR2 turbos sound ok, mainly on idle, nice and beefy. Nothing beats the sound of an NA engine, especially a vtec. Certainly not a v6 converted mk2. As the Supra NA sounds better than the Turbo.
Barrie

Re: Prelude VTEC vs MR2 Turbo Question?

Post by Barrie »

Aye it does sound awesome in VTEC mode... :)

But I can't imagine a tuned MR2 sounds crap, and I'm more of a form over function kinda chap anyway.
matt_mr2t
Posts: 27785
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 3:30 pm
Location: Essex

Re: Prelude VTEC vs MR2 Turbo Question?

Post by matt_mr2t »

I hate the sound of vtecs. They sound like crotchrockets.

Cant beat the sound a V or flat engine full stop.
Tiamat
IMOC Moderator
Posts: 10179
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 2:02 pm
Location: Hailsham, East Sussex

Re: Prelude VTEC vs MR2 Turbo Question?

Post by Tiamat »

matt_mr2t wrote:I hate the sound of vtecs. They sound like crotchrockets.


Nowt wrong with a crotchrocket.
I am going to live forever, or die trying!
matt_mr2t
Posts: 27785
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 3:30 pm
Location: Essex

Re: Prelude VTEC vs MR2 Turbo Question?

Post by matt_mr2t »

I reckon you'll be in the minority on here buddy :eye:
nakamura
Posts: 2512
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 2:40 pm
Location: bournemouth

Re: Prelude VTEC vs MR2 Turbo Question?

Post by nakamura »

Matt you do hate Hondas for some reason. Fair enough up to you but i think you are prob minority really.
mattcambs
Posts: 2308
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 9:59 pm
Location: Saffron Walden, Essex

Re: Prelude VTEC vs MR2 Turbo Question?

Post by mattcambs »

matt_mr2t wrote:I hate the sound of vtecs. They sound like crotchrockets.

Cant beat the sound a V or flat engine full stop.


Have you ever driven an S2000? Unbelievably good sounding exhaust note for a 4 pot when you get into the VTEC zone. In fact, in many ways they're the perfect affordable sports car (at least when the prices come down a bit more).
matt_mr2t
Posts: 27785
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 3:30 pm
Location: Essex

Re: Prelude VTEC vs MR2 Turbo Question?

Post by matt_mr2t »

mattcambs wrote:
matt_mr2t wrote:I hate the sound of vtecs. They sound like crotchrockets.

Cant beat the sound a V or flat engine full stop.


Have you ever driven an S2000? Unbelievably good sounding exhaust note for a 4 pot when you get into the VTEC zone. In fact, in many ways they're the perfect affordable sports car (at least when the prices come down a bit more).


Of all the Honda's available the S2000 and NSX are the only interesting ones as they're both purpose built, RWD sports cars.

The reason I dont like them much is because IMO they all look boring, are mainly all FWD and have engines that have to do 9k revs to be fast.
While I can appreciate the engineering, ridiculously high revving engines arent very good on the road.
I also think 9k revs doesnt sound that great, too high pitched. Every CTR etc I've ever heard sounds like a motorbike.
lower
Posts: 438
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 2:05 pm
Location: Leicester

Re: Prelude VTEC vs MR2 Turbo Question?

Post by lower »

mattcambs wrote:
Have you ever driven an S2000? Unbelievably good sounding exhaust note for a 4 pot when you get into the VTEC zone. In fact, in many ways they're the perfect affordable sports car (at least when the prices come down a bit more).


:whistle:
mattcambs
Posts: 2308
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 9:59 pm
Location: Saffron Walden, Essex

Re: Prelude VTEC vs MR2 Turbo Question?

Post by mattcambs »

In what ways do you prefer the S2000 to an MR2 our of interest?
I've only driven one once - my uncle's in California - but it was for an extended drive on some awesome driving roads. I'd say that in pretty much most areas it is superior to a mk2 MR2 except perhaps for driver involvement through the corners. An S2000 is a nicer car to be in, though and the engineering quality shines through in all areas. The engine is a genuine all time classic.

Sorry, bit OT [-X
:D
lower
Posts: 438
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 2:05 pm
Location: Leicester

Re: Prelude VTEC vs MR2 Turbo Question?

Post by lower »

I had a rev2 Turbo for about 4 years and loved it.

When i wanted to change it was either for a newer MR2 or the S2000 which was the only real alternative as a 2 seater roadster with a reasonable boot size and similar speed to the MR2.

So i went for the S2000, primarily because it was a change and because i could afford one with a warranty.

I'm now on my second S2000, this one i bought new.

Why do i prefer it? Stock for stock the S2000 is a much better handling car. Up until recently i tracked my S2k about 6 times a year and found it a good track car, if a little heavy on brakes. Its faster on acceleration than my old MR2 (though there's not a lot in it) though it does take some getting used to driving a VTEC and using the rev range and you don't get the push in back that the torque of a 3S-GTE gives you. I prefer the interior (mainly because its more up to date) and even though my mr2 was a T-Bar i prefer being able to drop the whole roof.

Cons- My S2000's have not been the most reliable. I had 3 engines in the first one and i'm on my second engine in the current one. Having said that they've all been replaced under warranty. Other than that, nothing's gone wrong at all apart from the odd cracked brake disc (but that's from extreme heat with race pads on the track)

Overall, i loved my MR2 and really enjoyed owning it. But it just got to long in the tooth for me and i wanted something a bit more up to date in stying, but more importantly in handling.
matt_mr2t
Posts: 27785
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 3:30 pm
Location: Essex

Re: Prelude VTEC vs MR2 Turbo Question?

Post by matt_mr2t »

Hmm, puts paid to the myth that v-tec engines never go wrong!
C50
Posts: 6405
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 10:31 am
Location: Rhondda Cynon Taff

Re: Prelude VTEC vs MR2 Turbo Question?

Post by C50 »

5 vtecs engines from one person.. maybe he keeps it at redline for lengthy amounts of time and not check oil levels, change oil, etc.. :-k
Image
Martin F
IMOC Moderator
Posts: 14822
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 1:19 pm
Location: The Couch !

Re: Prelude VTEC vs MR2 Turbo Question?

Post by Martin F »

there reliability was meant to be excellent then you come across someone going through 5 engines in relatively new cars.... :?
Post Reply

Return to “Driving Experiences”