![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![Embarassed :oops:](./images/smilies/icon_redface.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
glad you've finally hit the magic figure, so how different are you finding the difference between now and when you first bought your car.
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members
Hellboy wrote:It would be great to know what a stock Rev 2 ecu, with all you bolt ons and same boost pressure would do?
20HP at best in the difference?
(no doubt the map is better on the Power FC so day to day driving might feel better and MPG might improve off boost)
jimGTS wrote:Hellboy wrote:It would be great to know what a stock Rev 2 ecu, with all you bolt ons and same boost pressure would do?
20HP at best in the difference?
(no doubt the map is better on the Power FC so day to day driving might feel better and MPG might improve off boost)
might be 20 or something, but torque curves on the rev2 ecus peak at like 3.5 and take a massive dive by redline, im holding near enough my peak pretty much throughout the whole midrange..
.
.
.probably where the difference is, and im holding my peak hp to for a little while.
.
.
in fairness, the only really difference from most other basic modded rev1/2s is the fact ive ditched afm, popped in 540s and mapped on power fc..
.
.
.
sure ive done bored out rail, fuel pump, rev3 inlet cam, but these arnt going to make up to much difference if anything, maybe the cam a few hp..
.
.purely on there for safetly, like the arps and metal headgasket.
.
.
jimGTS wrote:
L0rdMike wrote:jimGTS wrote:
![]()
The CT26 isnt that bad
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()