[All] [Generic] What should've the Mk2 designers included?

Discussion and technical advice the SW20 MR2. 3S-GTE, 3S-GE, 3S-FE etc
Anything and everything to do with maintenance, modifications and electrical is in here for the Mk2.

Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members

KrisMoyse
Posts: 654
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 4:16 pm
Location: Bognor Regis
Contact:

Re: [All] [Generic] What should've the Mk2 designers included?

Post by KrisMoyse »

That to me Matt?
Greddy-Matt
Posts: 4412
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 3:51 pm
Location: Southampton

Re: [All] [Generic] What should've the Mk2 designers included?

Post by Greddy-Matt »

More a general musing, mate :D But yeah I was thinking of how the 4wd would be possible...
KrisMoyse
Posts: 654
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 4:16 pm
Location: Bognor Regis
Contact:

Re: [All] [Generic] What should've the Mk2 designers included?

Post by KrisMoyse »

Don't know to me honest mate, was doing the same thing: waiting for someone to explain lol

Think it'd be possible though. Take the 4wd runnign gear from a GT4 and put it on an MR2 Mk2
RichardK
Posts: 1695
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 10:47 pm
Location: West Midlands
Contact:

Re: [All] [Generic] What should've the Mk2 designers included?

Post by RichardK »

Anything is possible ;)

Porsche 911s have AWD and rear mounted engines. Get a suitable FWD transfer case and make it so - but where will you put the fuel tank? In the boot, perhaps?

Question is, though, why would you want to make it 4x4?

Some people surely get into the MR2 for the looks, but I thought most people went for them because of the way they drive...
KrisMoyse
Posts: 654
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 4:16 pm
Location: Bognor Regis
Contact:

Re: [All] [Generic] What should've the Mk2 designers included?

Post by KrisMoyse »

Just for something different, something original would be why I'd do it
RichardK
Posts: 1695
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 10:47 pm
Location: West Midlands
Contact:

Re: [All] [Generic] What should've the Mk2 designers included?

Post by RichardK »

I think the hardest part would be getting a front drivetrain setup - the tunnel is there, move the fuel tank to the boot... I'm trying to figure out how the transfer case would work - maybe chain drive from a GT4 gearbox, if MR2 gearboxes are basically the same units... propshafts and driveshafts are easy. Some sort of front diff, and some carriers for the front hubs.

There are very few <i>light</i> mid engined AWD cars; seems to be a preserve of rally and supercars (yes, a 6R4 is light to a degree, but it's also powered by a hairy V6 and has no interior trim to speak of). Are 205 T16s transverse? Might be worth looking at the layout on those...
marcnoonan
Posts: 855
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 3:25 am
Location: Skelton nr Redcar

Re: [All] [Generic] What should've the Mk2 designers included?

Post by marcnoonan »

Had mine nearly 8 years, and.....

Should have had a six speed box for motorways.
Lower roof line, like the photoshopped one! (i'm 6'2") Thinner seat would have done it.
Windscreen wipers that don't lift.

And a Cut/dip in the centre console so you can touch the female passenger!

Marc
RichardK
Posts: 1695
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 10:47 pm
Location: West Midlands
Contact:

Re: [All] [Generic] What should've the Mk2 designers included?

Post by RichardK »

I think the dip in the console might have affected fuel range a little bit ;)
KrisMoyse
Posts: 654
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 4:16 pm
Location: Bognor Regis
Contact:

Re: [All] [Generic] What should've the Mk2 designers included?

Post by KrisMoyse »

marcnoonan wrote:And a Cut/dip in the centre console so you can touch the female passenger!

Marc


I know it says 'female' passenger but I ain't ever gettin in your car Marc!
poser
Posts: 199
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 1:23 pm
Location: Newcastle

Re: [All] [Generic] What should've the Mk2 designers included?

Post by poser »

There is no question that indicators should be on the right: it's all about being able to indicate and change gear at the same time.

Besides, my MKI Escort had them on the right too, and there was NOTHING wrong with that car. End of debate.

:wink:
C50
Posts: 6405
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 10:31 am
Location: Rhondda Cynon Taff

Re: [All] [Generic] What should've the Mk2 designers included?

Post by C50 »

marcnoonan wrote:Cut/dip in the centre console so you can touch the female passenger!
Marc


:lol: but very true and vice versa :thumleft:
JoeM

Re: [All] [Generic] What should've the Mk2 designers included?

Post by JoeM »

Was thinking on the way to work this morning.
A Small V8 would be great :D
raptor95GTS
Posts: 6213
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 7:14 pm
Location: glasgow
Contact:

Re: [All] [Generic] What should've the Mk2 designers included?

Post by raptor95GTS »

t bar design that doesn't leak. Turbo v6 as an option and supra hubs used instead of unique units that feck up any brake upgrades ](*,)
Post Reply

Return to “MR2 MK2 1990 - 1999 NA & Turbo”