[Mk2] [Turbo] Rev3 - CT20b v CT26 hybrid v CT20b hybrid

Posts about anything do to with modifying your car such as fitting aftermarket parts, bodykit, or tuning the engine for more performance.

Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members

rev3gtturbo
Posts: 424
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 10:31 pm

[Mk2] [Turbo] Rev3 - CT20b v CT26 hybrid v CT20b hybrid

Post by rev3gtturbo »

As some us might only replace a turbo once, any new turbo will feel loads better that an old tired one, so I don't know how easy it is to answer this question (without a dyno).

What is the best bolt on turbo for a rev3 to give it a bit more power over stock for reliable daily driver road use, upto 300 bhp?
(Car is stock apart from an HKS induction kit, Blitz bov and an MBC).

I think the choice is between stock CT20b, or a hybrid CT26 or a hybrid CT20b?

Any recommended suppliers? (PM me if there are any to avoid).

Any experience of how many miles they last?
(I know of 2 rev3's that did over 120,000 miles on the original turbo without them failing, but it is looking like my current rev3 car has seen off 2 CT20b's in around 110,000 miles).

At the moment it is looking likely I need to buy something next week.

cheers
sky-net
Posts: 169
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2013 9:44 pm
Location: Málaga (Spain)

Re: [Mk2] [Turbo] Rev3 - CT20b v CT26 hybrid v CT20b hybrid

Post by sky-net »

i've been reading about the ATS CT21 this afternoon. It seems to be a pretty decent upgrade over stock CT20b as a direct bolt on
craig
Posts: 43936
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 3:44 am

Re: [Mk2] [Turbo] Rev3 - CT20b v CT26 hybrid v CT20b hybrid

Post by craig »

A strengthened CT20b is a great road turbo. Toyota got it pretty spot on with it.

Just needs a steel shaft to replace the ceramic item, and 360 degree thrust washer as opposed the factory 270 degree item.

Boost increase and a stand alone ecu, you'll see over 300bhp, and a fast spooling powerful road car.
Last edited by craig on Sat Jan 10, 2015 7:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Nic
Posts: 1910
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2012 4:26 pm
Location: UK

Re: [Mk2] [Turbo] Rev3 - CT20b v CT26 hybrid v CT20b hybrid

Post by Nic »

If I needed to replace my CT20b turbo I would replace it with a Garrett GT28RS, a more modern, double ball bearing turbo which would give similar power but be far far more responsive. It would require an adapter for the stock exhaust manifold, water and oil lines and the downpipe modifying but could be run with the stock fueling and ECU at moderate boost levels.
Nic
[email protected]
MR2 Rev 3 GT Turbo
markstevieandmads
Posts: 2025
Joined: Mon Aug 05, 2013 8:18 pm
Location: Swindon, Wilts

Re: [Mk2] [Turbo] Rev3 - CT20b v CT26 hybrid v CT20b hybrid

Post by markstevieandmads »

I've read somewhere that ct20b spool is slower than a ct26 but people upgrade as a ct20b holds the boost to the red line where the ct26 dies off at the topend?
MR2 Rich
Posts: 1582
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2012 1:18 pm
Location: Harrogate North Yorkshire

Re: [Mk2] [Turbo] Rev3 - CT20b v CT26 hybrid v CT20b hybrid

Post by MR2 Rich »

I would definitely look at the GT28, I know there is a few versions so would need to read up on them.
No 2 :(
C35Rob
Posts: 2108
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 1:14 am
Location: Gateshead

Re: [Mk2] [Turbo] Rev3 - CT20b v CT26 hybrid v CT20b hybrid

Post by C35Rob »

Personally I don't see the point in a GT28rs, you need a manifold adaptor, new downpipe, oil and water lines etc.. And to get the best out of it you'll need a mappable ECU too.. For the costs involved you may as well go for a gt30, t34, td06 or a holset HX30

A hybrid ct20 would be a great street turbo for standard management and internals though - although ATS don't include any real details of the upgrades, I'd be wary of buying something without knowing really what it is.

Just my 2p
Odin_S
Posts: 1210
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 3:35 am
Location: London

Re: [Mk2] [Turbo] Rev3 - CT20b v CT26 hybrid v CT20b hybrid

Post by Odin_S »

I would say you were limited to 1.2bar so what's the point without going the whole way? I.e. forged engine

I still think CT20b is enough, those hybrids require running more boost to get there claimed numbers. Once you want to run more than 1.2bar, you start getting into limits for components eg fueling

All imo of course :D
Race Idiot
Posts: 2589
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 10:48 pm
Location: Hertfordshire

Re: [Mk2] [Turbo] Rev3 - CT20b v CT26 hybrid v CT20b hybrid

Post by Race Idiot »

I"d give owens development a call regarding your turbo. They did a fantastic rebuild on my TD05. Hell, owens even offered to convert my turbo into a ballbearing type instead of a journal bearing type.

They were also able to tell me exactly why the turbo failed, couldnt recomend them enough.

Maybe they might be able to even fit a billet compressor to one, i'm pretty sure thats what ATS have done with their CT21.
rev3gtturbo
Posts: 424
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 10:31 pm

Re: [Mk2] [Turbo] Rev3 - CT20b v CT26 hybrid v CT20b hybrid

Post by rev3gtturbo »

Thanks for the replies so far. I have spent loads of time this weekend going over the options.

For those that mentioned the Garrett GT28, why not the newer GTX28 ?
bobhatton
Posts: 3351
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 9:34 pm
Location: Bodmin Cornwall

Re: [Mk2] [Turbo] Rev3 - CT20b v CT26 hybrid v CT20b hybrid

Post by bobhatton »

rev3gtturbo wrote:Thanks for the replies so far. I have spent loads of time this weekend going over the options.

For those that mentioned the Garrett GT28, why not the newer GTX28 ?


Yes the GTX28, but the right one
Designer for turbo set ups on F1 cars, and Nitrous Oxide Systems of the USA in the 80s
rev3gtturbo
Posts: 424
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 10:31 pm

Re: [Mk2] [Turbo] Rev3 - CT20b v CT26 hybrid v CT20b hybrid

Post by rev3gtturbo »

bobhatton wrote:
rev3gtturbo wrote:Thanks for the replies so far. I have spent loads of time this weekend going over the options.

For those that mentioned the Garrett GT28, why not the newer GTX28 ?


Yes the GTX28, but the right one


What would be the right one?
Al-sw20
Posts: 1623
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 6:01 am
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Contact:

Re: [Mk2] [Turbo] Rev3 - CT20b v CT26 hybrid v CT20b hybrid

Post by Al-sw20 »

Best stock fuel system turbo is still the ct20b. They are cheap, plentiful and provide proven performance time and time again.

GT28 is a total waste of time and money. Two of my friends with MR2's have these turbos.

One runs a gen3 3sgte that has a forged bottom end and 1mm oversized valves. Run by an old Link Plu ecu! Stock ct20b @ 1 bar on 95 RON fuel, intake, downpipe, exhaust, greddy copy intercooler. Puts down 291hp @ wheels.

The other has a stock gen3 engine, Power FC, intake, downpipe, exhaust, Greddy sidemount intercooler, GT28RS (0.63 A/R) @ 1.1 bar boost on 98 RON fuel. 292hp @ wheels.
bobhatton
Posts: 3351
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 9:34 pm
Location: Bodmin Cornwall

Re: [Mk2] [Turbo] Rev3 - CT20b v CT26 hybrid v CT20b hybrid

Post by bobhatton »

rev3gtturbo wrote:
bobhatton wrote:
rev3gtturbo wrote:Thanks for the replies so far. I have spent loads of time this weekend going over the options.

For those that mentioned the Garrett GT28, why not the newer GTX28 ?


Yes the GTX28, but the right one


What would be the right one?



http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbobyga ... r#GTX2860R
Designer for turbo set ups on F1 cars, and Nitrous Oxide Systems of the USA in the 80s
jimGTS
Posts: 14024
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: North Kent

Re: [Mk2] [Turbo] Rev3 - CT20b v CT26 hybrid v CT20b hybrid

Post by jimGTS »

Al-sw20 wrote:

One runs a gen3 3sgte that has a forged bottom end and 1mm oversized valves. Run by an old Link Plu ecu! Stock ct20b @ 1 bar on 95 RON fuel, intake, downpipe, exhaust, greddy copy intercooler. Puts down 291hp @ wheels.



im assuming this is some sort of world record at 1bar of boost and that grade of fuel?
that is certainly not the norm for 1bar.
Last edited by jimGTS on Mon Jan 12, 2015 12:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Nic
Posts: 1910
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2012 4:26 pm
Location: UK

Re: [Mk2] [Turbo] Rev3 - CT20b v CT26 hybrid v CT20b hybrid

Post by Nic »

rev3gtturbo wrote:For those that mentioned the Garrett GT28, why not the newer GTX28 ?


As a simple replacement for the stock turbo, the GT28RS would be my personal choice, I've used Garrett GT**R turbos in other cars and know just how good - and reliable - they are. If I was looking for more power and also upgrading the fueling and ECU then yes the GTX would be a better choice, they do however cost a lot more.
Nic
[email protected]
MR2 Rev 3 GT Turbo
DottySkee
Posts: 97
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2014 10:50 am
Location: Edinburgh

Re: [Mk2] [Turbo] Rev3 - CT20b v CT26 hybrid v CT20b hybrid

Post by DottySkee »

jimGTS wrote:
Al-sw20 wrote:

One runs a gen3 3sgte that has a forged bottom end and 1mm oversized valves. Run by an old Link Plu ecu! Stock ct20b @ 1 bar on 95 RON fuel, intake, downpipe, exhaust, greddy copy intercooler. Puts down 291hp @ wheels.



im assuming this is some sort of world record at 1bar of boost and that grade of fuel?
that is certainly not the norm for 1bar.


Even if it's accurate, the GT28RS car will spool quicker and make the car more driveable = faster. Modern turbos have taken a leap forward on driveability over 90s turbos

More to consider than just final BHP figure when it comes to changing the turbo,
Ryan S
IMOC Moderator
Posts: 10902
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2005 1:32 pm
Location: Bonnie Dundee
Contact:

Re: [Mk2] [Turbo] Rev3 - CT20b v CT26 hybrid v CT20b hybrid

Post by Ryan S »

The GTX28 will outspool a CT20 no problem, recently been out in a 3sgte with a GTX3071R and it out performs the CT20 on every level. spool up (with a front mount) was ridiculous so the GTX28 could surely only spool faster.
the CT20 is rubbish by comparison.
Al-sw20
Posts: 1623
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 6:01 am
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Contact:

Re: [Mk2] [Turbo] Rev3 - CT20b v CT26 hybrid v CT20b hybrid

Post by Al-sw20 »

So it should for the price. The ct20b is still the best all round turbo for the stock fuel system IMO. You could buy four of them for the price of a gt28 + bits needing to have it fitted.
craig
Posts: 43936
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 3:44 am

Re: [Mk2] [Turbo] Rev3 - CT20b v CT26 hybrid v CT20b hybrid

Post by craig »

Al-sw20 wrote:So it should for the price. The ct20b is still the best all round turbo for the stock fuel system IMO. You could buy four of them for the price of a gt28 + bits needing to have it fitted.


Agreed. Just because it's a mid 90s turbo, doesn't mean it's rubbish. It still gets my vote. My car my 320bhp @ 1.2 bar. Forged pistons, stock head, cams, fuelling. Exhaust, decat and cc. Mapped on apexi fc , premium unleaded.
Post Reply

Return to “Modifications”