![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
Am I right in thinking I need 2.6L for the mark 2 NA
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
Thank you all in advance
Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members
shinny wrote:Internet hype says MT90 is some form of magic potion.
RedMR² wrote:shinny wrote:Internet hype says MT90 is some form of magic potion.
Not hype, I've run Redline MT90 in my rev3 turbo LSD box since 2008.Highly recommended.
shinny wrote:RedMR² wrote:shinny wrote:Internet hype says MT90 is some form of magic potion.
Not hype, I've run Redline MT90 in my rev3 turbo LSD box since 2008.Highly recommended.
My experience:
rev5 NA: MT90 made no appreciable difference
rev3 turbo with stock, sealed LSD: MT90 made no appreciable difference
So from where I'm sitting, having used it in three different gearboxes, MT90 is just very expensive bottles of nothing special.I would never buy it again.
rev3turbo wrote:what differences were you expecting?
I've ran MT90 since 2004 in NA and turbo boxes, I've never had a problem, but the gearbox's havent had a problem to start with either..
Meaning the MT90 has surely done its job, in keeping them in good health.
bobhatton wrote:This is what we have used for a number of years now.
http://www.opieoils.co.uk/p-1021-red-li ... 0w-75.aspx
Skywalker wrote:Not mt90, 75w90 gl4/5 semi/ fully synth imo