![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
I can't help but notice how cheap the mk3 is.
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
Anyone driven
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
Engine swaps are a no go.
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members
sheppy wrote:i think toyota made a bit of a lemon with the mk3, horrible looks and a rubbish engine with no turbo/supercharged option, total rubbish, the mr2 ended with the mk2.
Rosssco wrote:sheppy wrote:i think toyota made a bit of a lemon with the mk3, horrible looks and a rubbish engine with no turbo/supercharged option, total rubbish, the mr2 ended with the mk2.
Clearly haven't driven one..
.
![]()
![]()
Ekona wrote:No-one bought the mk3, why bother with a mk4?
greglebon wrote:So you're saying no-one wants a mid-engined, 2 seater sports car anymore..
.
.
.
!?!?
![]()
![]()
Mike N wrote:Has anyone fitted a mk2 Turbo engine to one of these yet, I did a search but couldn't find any.Maybe I just missed them all!