Hello,
I was about to order some Falken 452s after much reading on here. I.e. they're the tyre of choice alongside AD08s.
However, on the Camskill site (and it appears on Falken site) they don't do a 45 profile in 16s.
What I understand as the optimum size I need is:
Front 205/45/16
Rear 225/45/16
So now I can't do that I'd have 205/50/16 at the front.
Would that look weird and would it affect the handling?
I understand that 45 on the rear is correct. 50 would throw off the rolling radius/speedo reading.
Advice plus any pics would be helpful. Time for me to invest in something useful on the car!
Quick one on tyres
Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members
-
- Posts: 3781
- Joined: Fri May 28, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: London, Edinburgh, or the Highlands!
Re: Quick one on tyres
In short, yes.
225/50/16 on the rear will throw your speedo out such that when speedo says 62mph, you'll be doing 65mph. How much this matters is up to you really. 225/45 would be 62mph = 62mph.
Visually, your wheelwells will look more full, which could be a good thing.
If your car is lowered you might have problems rubbing on arches/liners, particularly on the front.
225/50/16 on the rear will throw your speedo out such that when speedo says 62mph, you'll be doing 65mph. How much this matters is up to you really. 225/45 would be 62mph = 62mph.
Visually, your wheelwells will look more full, which could be a good thing.
If your car is lowered you might have problems rubbing on arches/liners, particularly on the front.
Re: Quick one on tyres
I had 205/50/16 and 225/45/16 on 16x7/8, was a nice setup IMO
These sizes are available in the 452 and the AD08, which is what's in the above pictures.
These sizes are available in the 452 and the AD08, which is what's in the above pictures.
Re: Quick one on tyres
Did Falken used to do 452s in 205/45/16?
Seems weird that they don't.
What was the reason (other than availability) that made you go with a 50 profile up front? Have you compared it to a 45 profile?
Seems weird that they don't.
What was the reason (other than availability) that made you go with a 50 profile up front? Have you compared it to a 45 profile?
Re: Quick one on tyres
I went with a 50 up front to:
1. stay in line with the standard stagger which is both width and profile
2. keep the tyre heights as close to equal as possible front to back
205/100*50=102.5 mm
225/100*45=101.25 mm
No idea if they do a 205/45/16, to me that would look a bit too skinny with a 225/45 on the rear.
1. stay in line with the standard stagger which is both width and profile
2. keep the tyre heights as close to equal as possible front to back
205/100*50=102.5 mm
225/100*45=101.25 mm
No idea if they do a 205/45/16, to me that would look a bit too skinny with a 225/45 on the rear.
Re: Quick one on tyres
Hmm, anybody else done this?
I see Marf's logic but also just wondering what others are doing with side wall depths? (balance the discussion so to speak)
I ask as all I only tend to read people running matching wall depths front and back.
As it happens I'm a bit stuck in regards to 45 profile for the Falkens on the front since I can't find them (discontinued)!
Since this little lot is going to set me back just shy of £400 I'd like to get it 'right'.
Cheers!
I see Marf's logic but also just wondering what others are doing with side wall depths? (balance the discussion so to speak)
I ask as all I only tend to read people running matching wall depths front and back.
As it happens I'm a bit stuck in regards to 45 profile for the Falkens on the front since I can't find them (discontinued)!
Since this little lot is going to set me back just shy of £400 I'd like to get it 'right'.
Cheers!
Re: Quick one on tyres
I'm running 225/45/16s fk452s but could never get them in 205/45/16 hence why i run shitey toyos up front.
Think the fk453s are out so I'd try them for more variety in size
Think the fk453s are out so I'd try them for more variety in size
Re: Quick one on tyres
Racer7 wrote:
I ask as all I only tend to read people running matching wall depths front and back.
I'd wager that's because most people don't really understand the relationship between width and profile, and also those running 17s are limited as to their tyre choice up front, hence end up running equal profiles, usually a 40 profile as a 45 would be too fat up front for a 17.
Go look at the sticker in your drivers door shut. OEM tyres have stagger of both profile and width. that should be enough to convince you that it's normal.
In reality I doubt you'd notice much difference, but as I said a 205/45 up front is gonna look skinny compared to a 225/45 at the rear.
205/100*45 = 92.25mm
225/100*45 = 101.25mm
More sidewall is better also for comfort, and steering feedback when pressing on.
Re: Quick one on tyres
Ok Marf, fair play on the logic. Though I wonder if others have tried a higher profile up front only to go back to equal front and back.
But now you can expect another commission cheque from Yokohama. I'm now considering getting the AD08s (do a search and your name is always next to that combination of letters and numbers!)
Part of this is that I do think that running 50 profile and 45 on the back will look a bit weird. I currently have T1Rs (I think) on my wheels and put them next to each other today. Didn't think it looked too off.
Anyhow, back at the IMOC community, at £474 I'm just wondering if these tyres really are the nutz? More importantnly I'm wondering how important it is that I run them all round?
I was thinking I could go AD08s on the back (improving on the 452 option) and something like the KUMHO Ectsa KU39s at £63 or Goodyear F1s at £80 a pop versus £114 for the AD08s at the front. This would really be a price driven decision (i.e being cheap! and I hardly drive the car).
Will better tyres up front will make noticeable difference in comparison to the cheaper ones? If so I may be tempted to cough up the extra £40-60 per wheel.
I currently struggle to do even 1000miles a year at the moment so I'm figuring that the wear may be a moot point due to the number of years I could run them. Though I am worried that I may need to change the tyres if they get old and funny after time...does that happen?
Incidentally for those looking at the AD08 here is some useful info I found:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OC83IbX__Gg
But now you can expect another commission cheque from Yokohama. I'm now considering getting the AD08s (do a search and your name is always next to that combination of letters and numbers!)
Part of this is that I do think that running 50 profile and 45 on the back will look a bit weird. I currently have T1Rs (I think) on my wheels and put them next to each other today. Didn't think it looked too off.
Anyhow, back at the IMOC community, at £474 I'm just wondering if these tyres really are the nutz? More importantnly I'm wondering how important it is that I run them all round?
I was thinking I could go AD08s on the back (improving on the 452 option) and something like the KUMHO Ectsa KU39s at £63 or Goodyear F1s at £80 a pop versus £114 for the AD08s at the front. This would really be a price driven decision (i.e being cheap! and I hardly drive the car).
Will better tyres up front will make noticeable difference in comparison to the cheaper ones? If so I may be tempted to cough up the extra £40-60 per wheel.
I currently struggle to do even 1000miles a year at the moment so I'm figuring that the wear may be a moot point due to the number of years I could run them. Though I am worried that I may need to change the tyres if they get old and funny after time...does that happen?
Incidentally for those looking at the AD08 here is some useful info I found:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OC83IbX__Gg
-
- Posts: 3781
- Joined: Fri May 28, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: London, Edinburgh, or the Highlands!
Re: Quick one on tyres
Tyres do harden over time, yeah.
I'm a stickler for a good tyre on a sports car, I don't see the point in a great car with crap rubber, so I'd always just say buy the best you can afford.
I'm a stickler for a good tyre on a sports car, I don't see the point in a great car with crap rubber, so I'd always just say buy the best you can afford.
Re: Quick one on tyres
Those ad08s are extremely good all year round and can be used as a normal road tyre without worrying. Surprisingly they wear nicely too (depending on power..)considering the performance.
Re: Quick one on tyres
I've run mixed and matched sets of tyres and in my experienced matched is always better.
Despite it being MOT compliant to have different tyres front and rear, on a sports car I think it's silly to mix compounds and sidewall stiffness front to rear.
Any understeer exhibited at the front end is worsened by having a stickier tyre on the rear. Now factor in that the LSD also has a tendency to make the car push on in tighter slow speed corners anyway and I'm convinced that matched is better.
I had T1R up front and Yoko A022 on the rear before my AD08s, and it exhibited exactly those characteristics.
In your example above you're talking about mixing FK452 and AD08.
The A022 was much stickier than the T1R, and if I'm not mistaken the FK452 has a higher treadwear rating than a T1R? i.e less grip and more tendency to understeer,
I don't mean to harp on and yes they're pricey(mine cost 490 I think) but you'd be pleasantly surprised how much better your car would feel on a complete set of AD08s
Despite it being MOT compliant to have different tyres front and rear, on a sports car I think it's silly to mix compounds and sidewall stiffness front to rear.
Any understeer exhibited at the front end is worsened by having a stickier tyre on the rear. Now factor in that the LSD also has a tendency to make the car push on in tighter slow speed corners anyway and I'm convinced that matched is better.
I had T1R up front and Yoko A022 on the rear before my AD08s, and it exhibited exactly those characteristics.
In your example above you're talking about mixing FK452 and AD08.
The A022 was much stickier than the T1R, and if I'm not mistaken the FK452 has a higher treadwear rating than a T1R? i.e less grip and more tendency to understeer,
I don't mean to harp on and yes they're pricey(mine cost 490 I think) but you'd be pleasantly surprised how much better your car would feel on a complete set of AD08s