![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
MR2 Rich wrote:My NA is gutless at the bottom end isn't it because its a twin cam? One for economy one for power at the top end?
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
the two cams are for intake and exhaust.
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members
MR2 Rich wrote:My NA is gutless at the bottom end isn't it because its a twin cam? One for economy one for power at the top end?
Johnr32 wrote:Just spotted this:
http://www.pistonheads.com/classifieds/ ... 03/1043807
Has to be one of the cleanest and unmolested mr2s I've seen for a while now.
RedMR² wrote:Johnr32 wrote:Just spotted this:
http://www.pistonheads.com/classifieds/ ... 03/1043807
Has to be one of the cleanest and unmolested mr2s I've seen for a while now.
WOW, that's mega clean, and worth the asking price imo for a clean original rev2 turbo like that.
People would rather buy a cheap dog though and spend more than the above car costs, to put it right.![]()
![]()
swin wrote:a couple of years ago if you looked on piston heads there would have been about 250 mr2's for sale most of them mark 2, look now there's about 50 mostly mark 3's