Tempting, apart from the paint job :-/

[N9THX]

On ebay

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/1990-TOYOTA-M ... 560wt_1397

not sure how it passed the mot with those protruding wheels?

[badgerbob]

Apologies if this is a members car but that looks stupid :/

[N9THX]

Missing the front lip and rear spoiler, looks weird :-/

[craig]

it's got potential. Could make a nice project!

Front lip isn't missing, it's just the rev 1 shallow front lip.

[N9THX]

Cheap as chips too, I've just put in a cheeky offer

[tonigmr2]

I really like it actually.

[vtecpower]

Cheap as chips too, I've just put in a cheeky offer

Let us know the cheeky offer

[N9THX]

£900 although i think it's worth the asking price considering the cost of the conversion.

I'd fit some arches, later front lip, rear Rev3 lights and spoiler, spray it white or gloss black.

[rover19376]

Must be running with spacers on for poke out that much, but yep -either abflug arch extensions or rid of the spacers.

Tyres must catch the archies.

[craig]

£900 although i think it's worth the asking price considering the cost of the conversion.

I'd fit some arches, later front lip, rear Rev3 lights and spoiler, spray it white or gloss black.

Nah, looks badass with no spoiler and rev 1/2 lights!

[rover19376]

I like the exhaust

[HighwayStar]

No spoiler and rev1 lights ... the way forward. Not sure about the exhaust or the paint job.

R

[DAN_REV1_TURBO]

Give it a set of rogue quad pop up lights, rev 3 rear lights, an exhaust that suits (deffo does not look right positioned in the middle!), flared arches, respray in one colour, and maybe a nice rear wing (not a huge whack off thing, but like a carbon drift wing with the 2 legs/GT wing type). It would be damn cool.

[alanmr2turbo]

wheels and quad lights are all i like about it. I hate V6 conversions all noise and no go

[N9THX]

Thought the 3.0 V6 was comparable to the 2.0 Turbo, or why do it?

Never driven one to find out so I'm just reading up on them.

[Peter Gidden]

Thought the 3.0 V6 was comparable to the 2.0 Turbo, or why do it?

It is in terms of standing 1/4. Almost identical times.

why do it?

Much more even torque curve, loads of bottom and midrange.

[slipping clutch]

hmmmm, I'm based in Swindon, I may just take a look at this and see if it has any potential

[N9THX]

That's enough go for me!

[alanmr2turbo]

Thought the 3.0 V6 was comparable to the 2.0 Turbo, or why do it?

Never driven one to find out so I'm just reading up on them.

Yes it is around 220bhp

but then for the money you spend converting it to a V6 you could spend less and put a virtually straight swap REV3 tubby engine in with a few mods and be at 300bhp

If you already have a tubby then for the same price of conversion you would have close to 350-400bhp

Hence why i said all noise, no go

[N9THX]

What would a turbo charged v6 be putting out?