![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members
Ridge Racer wrote:What is a sensible mileage to look out for? I've seen some at 89k some at 194k![]()
obviously less if best but.
.
.
whats a reasonable amount before you would consider it too much?
I would buy on condition rather than mileage at this stage.![]()
When I bought mine at 15 year-old, it has done 150k.10k per annual used for motorway run from Wolverhampton to Heathrow daily from a guy who has another 4
(more exotic) cars and 2 bikes.
The MR2 was his commuter car really.
![]()
Look for full service history, regular cambelt changes, suspension and brakes overhauls and no rust.Also do a compression test and you are pretty much sorted.
I was out in Wales last weekend driving as well as swapping cars and the guys could not believe it has 172k on the clock.The drive was just like a new car
.
.
.
which is what I expects as it has had suspension and brakes overhaul last year
(i.e.
new springs, dampers, drop links, bushes, discs, pads, calipers-serviced, fluids all round).
![]()
I would suggest you get a ride with as many members as possible so you get a sense what a good car should drive like and use that as a benchmark rather than based on mileage.![]()
Bottom line- you want a clean and well maintained car which has done no more than 30k-40k or 3-4 years since the last suspension and brakes overhaul.
Rubber perish with time
(under-used) as well as mileage.
Ridge Racer wrote:I would LOVE this one..
.
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Toyota-MR2-GT ... 697wt_1396
Such a stunning car! Just a shame its a T bar
![]()
![]()
Ridge Racer wrote:Actually..
I haven't but to be honest I don't really want a turbo model.
I'm not really in it for the speed/power.
![]()
I see you're from Wiltshire! Where abouts? I'm from Gloucestershire but have family in Wiltshire![]()
Ridge Racer wrote:I would LOVE this one..
.
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Toyota-MR2-GT ... 697wt_1396
Such a stunning car! Just a shame its a T bar
Will do, What sort of PSI should each cylinder be doing roughly?
Very good point there! Are the brakes and suspension the thing to mainly look out for then on these?(rust too?)
Do these mark 2's rust as bad as the mark 1's?![]()
Ridge Racer wrote:Also I heard some time ago that the rev 1/2 were more tail happy/didn't handle as well as the later models? I'm actually slightly worried about the tail happy side of things I've heard a lot about people spinning them on roundabouts![]()
riot68 wrote:To get cheaper insurance you'll be better with a UK car& they were never available in tin tops just moon roof
& tbar, good luck getting one though.
Awesome cars which ever one.
.
.
Fair enough, If you're not bothered about speed then no point enduring the costs that come with a turbo, low mpg, higher insurance and purchase cost etc.I live in Trowbridge, whereabouts are your family?
bigchief10uk wrote:oh sorry just saw your last question about the colour lol..
.
yes that colour was actually quite rare and hard to get a hold of.
.
![]()
bigchief10uk wrote:as i said aswell dont worry about what rev you get..
.
the 1's and 2's are always going to be cheaper to buy.
![]()
they are lighter but have a little bit less power and dont tend to have power steering but you dont need it and dont notice it to be honest..
.