![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![Image](http://www.team-bhp.com/forum/attachments/super-cars-imports-india/56435d1223278343-pics-toyota-formula-1-car-marriott-juhu-img_0605.jpg)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
Looks a lot steeper than the mr2 doesn't it?
Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members
splashnatz wrote:wing on this looks more angled.
Image Replaced With URL For Quote
![]()
http://www.scienceofspeed.com/products/ ... l1_NSX.jpg
Slarty wrote:
it's just that we subscrible to the theory of hitting it harder until it works.Or something falls off, in which case you've hit it too hard.
bri0905 wrote:Should have gone to specsavers mate..
.
Slarty wrote:
it's just that we subscrible to the theory of hitting it harder until it works.Or something falls off, in which case you've hit it too hard.
Slarty wrote:
it's just that we subscrible to the theory of hitting it harder until it works.Or something falls off, in which case you've hit it too hard.
HighwayStar wrote:Hmmm..
.
.
For a road car you want something pretty, you know like as a g/f you want an attractive woman.This is more the filthy hooker look.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I like.
R.
g.lewarne wrote:
and frankly, the point of this thread was about how it looks, not its performance.![]()
and i dont like the way it looks.
g.lewarne wrote:but that front vent is just pulling air from the tyre area, not from behind the wheel.
Rob wrote:g.lewarne wrote:but that front vent is just pulling air from the tyre area, not from behind the wheel.
That stops the air sucked into the wheel arch from getting trapped and acting like an air brake.
Rob wrote:All of the parts you can see on that car are race functional