X19 vs Mk1

Discussion and technical advice for 84-89 AW10 & AW11 MR2. 3A-LU, 4A-GE, 4A-GZE.

Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members

bobbyh
Posts: 224
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 12:14 am
Location: manchester

X19 vs Mk1

Post by bobbyh »

saw a lovely powder blue one of these this week. a rare spot indeed nowadays. absolutely lovely.
got me thinking. the MR2 is no where near as pretty. but its a lot quicker, and a lot more reliable.
anyone driven/owned both?

http://www.carandclassic.co.uk/car/C94726/
PW@Woodsport
Posts: 7642
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 6:40 pm
Location: durham
Contact:

Re: X19 vs Mk1

Post by PW@Woodsport »

the MR2 is no where near as pretty


Seriously? For me the Mk1 looks a million percent better.... all in the eye of the beholder i suppose.
Image
crazylegs
Posts: 2811
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 4:13 pm
Location: Wiltshire

Re: X19 vs Mk1

Post by crazylegs »

X19 pretty ? to me its got no real flow. not planned they just stuck a couple of boxes together. still we are all different.
kaiowas
Posts: 1953
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 3:06 pm
Location: Norfolk
Contact:

Re: X19 vs Mk1

Post by kaiowas »

bobbyh wrote:
anyone driven/owned both?


Tom (Icsunonove - the clue is in the name ;)) has had X19s
010on1986
Posts: 586
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 4:17 pm
Location: UK

Re: X19 vs Mk1

Post by 010on1986 »

I had a w reg 1981 powder metallic blue 1500cc x1/9 as a first car in 1987. and broke a silver x reg to keep it going.

I loved it ......when it worked, but it was so unreliable and got rusty. It was not a car you could depend on. It rusted fast.... but not around the rear arches.... Hard to start when hot. from what I remember far far more fun than an MR2 to drive although not as quick. (bit like a mini)

The roof set up was so neat, two clips and its off, slips under the front bonnet. didn't leak.

Pretty.... I always thought they were a bit too narrow, but the dallara kit..nice, always needed an alfa v6 plonked in the back.

I sold the x1/9 and bought an mr2 because mr2 didn't rust or have reliability issues.......
Charged
IMOC Committee
Posts: 8897
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 8:09 pm
Location: Herts

Re: X19 vs Mk1

Post by Charged »

PW@Woodsport wrote:

Seriously? For me the Mk1 looks a million percent better.... all in the eye of the beholder i suppose.


Agreed! Althought I'd love to try an Uno Turbo engine converted X19..
If you can't see the angle, you're in trouble.
Fog on the tyne
Posts: 30
Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 12:25 pm

Re: X19 vs Mk1

Post by Fog on the tyne »

I'm with Mr Woods on this one...MR2 is far prettier
I remember a neighbour having a X19 from new when I was a wee lad - when I first saw it I liked it, but seem to remember it being on the back of an AA truck more than on the road. I also remember seeing a MR2 for the first time - wow..and the first time I drove one in 1988 (managed to pursuade a mechanic to let me test drive it after its pre-delivery inspection) - was totally hooked!!
kevin..in
Posts: 3412
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 10:26 am
Location: stoke on trent

Re: X19 vs Mk1

Post by kevin..in »

anyone who knows the history of the MR2MK1 Club will know that the existance of the club is due to the fact that the X19 is a very poorly built car and it is this reason thet the Mk1 Club founder who at that time was an X19 owner realised that the X19 was fast dissapearing due mainly to rot, that he then looked for an alternative and found the far superior Mk1 MR2 the rest as they say is history!
X19s are a poorly built and under powered car but that has never stopped any vehicle having its devoted followers has it?
Mr2 is vastly superior in every aspect, but its all down to personal choice isn't it
most things have a marmite factor!
oukie
IMOC Organiser
Posts: 2474
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 7:34 pm
Location: Fife

Re: X19 vs Mk1

Post by oukie »

I love my mk1's and wouldn't have it any other way

I also like x19's I think the person who said they are poorly designed needs to have a closer look ,

They have a HUGE frunk a boot and where the spare wheel goes :clap:
some very clever use of space, Not to mention the roof :thumleft: yes they are under powered yes they fall apart and never work but they are the reason the mk1 was made :thumleft:

But I was looking at some nice example's at castle combe bask in april and there was one there with a Uno turbo engine fitted in :thumleft:
Mk1b White T-bar SC 1987, Mk1b White coupe Jan90, Mk1b White coupe Jan90 (spares), Mk1b Mica blue T-bar Mar90, Mk1b Mica blue T-bar,full climate control,Jan90, 5 mk1's :)
kevin..in
Posts: 3412
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 10:26 am
Location: stoke on trent

Re: X19 vs Mk1

Post by kevin..in »

oukie wrote:

I also like x19's I think the person who said they are poorly designed needs to have a closer look ,

They have a HUGE frunk a boot and where the spare wheel goes :clap:
some very clever use of space, Not to mention the roof :thumleft: yes they are under powered yes they fall apart and never work but they are the reason the mk1 was made :thumleft:


I have looked close enough thanks
infact I nearly bought one of the last Bertone X19s new in'89 (glad I saw sense)
the points you made just go to prove my statement that they are poorly designed and made
and no the X19 was never the reason that Toyota made the MR2
mid engined 2 seaters were around before this dire Fiat offering
Jim-SR
Posts: 841
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 11:14 pm
Location: Basingstoke
Contact:

Re: X19 vs Mk1

Post by Jim-SR »

mk1 mR2 is pretty much a replica of the X1/9 underneath. the suspension geometry is practically identical. the X1/9 was the inspiration for the MR2, naturally the MR2 evolved a good base into something better. as has been the case with Toyota throughout their history. they take a good European idea, then make it cheaper, better and more reliable.
andyj
Posts: 216
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2005 9:58 am
Location: Banstead, Surrey

Re: X19 vs Mk1

Post by andyj »

Yes, I've had several X19's and was one of the founder members of the Club back in 1984. The Club was started by Brian Jordan. Dave Harris, the Club's technical guy, went on to start the MR2 club with others ...and later owned one of the first SC's in the country.

Though underpowered the X19's are sensational go karts on the road. They have much more direct steering than the MR2 and it's geared to change lanes if you just move it a few inches! That, together with very controllable oversteer, makes them real fun to drive. They oversteer if prompted even at low speeds ...flick of the wrist gets the back out on roundabouts ...flick back brings it back in line. Incredible fun to drive.

The targa goes completely into the front boot ...and roofs don't leak. They have lovely rev counter that goes anti-clockwise.

Having said that they are underpowered, rust like crazy and switch gear is like something out of a Christmas cracker! Oh, then there's the electrics!!! Also, lack of power means you can't use throttle to control oversteer to any extent ...and with Weber carb's rather than fuel injection/16 valve/TVIS, the engine has serious flat spots. The jets block on the carb and you have to take them out and clean them from time to time to resume normal running! In fact, I've seen people carry different jets for when they go up mountains. Unlike injection, carbs don't compensate for reduced oxygen levels by going up a mountain.

So basically overall, they're not quite as good a package as the MR2 Mark1.

Best X19 I saw had the Fiat 2.0 litre twin cam fitted from the Fiat Strada (120 bhp I think) though the Uno Turbo was other option.
dopiaza
Posts: 96
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 4:33 pm
Location: Cirencester

Re: X19 vs Mk1

Post by dopiaza »

Not sure I'd agree that MR2s are superior in every way. owned both for a few years and whilst I can't argue that the MR2 is better made the X1/9 wins in the following ways:

1. Luggage space - huge frunk, not used for spare wheel
2. Removable roof, not just T-Tops
3. Even more go kart like handling - believe it or not!
4. Cheaper road tax (ok, scraping the barrel here!)

Don't get me wrong - I'd choose an MR2 over the X1/9 anyday. In fact I did exactly that last year when I decided to buy a fun car - had the X1/9 for a month and it was just too much hassle. So badly engineered you just couldn't trust it to get you where you were going. Realised the MR2 insurance was the same as the X1/9 and there was then no contest!
010on1986
Posts: 586
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 4:17 pm
Location: UK

Re: X19 vs Mk1

Post by 010on1986 »

reminds me...

The day I bought my mk1 mr2....I tried to drive in the the manner I used to drive my X1/9 and the mr2 failed, I was very very disappointed. No matter how much faster or better stopping the mr2 was, it was not as good as the fiat to drive, I was sort of happy and gutted at the same time....I had got rid of a car that was one big headache and got a well behaved heavy feeling japtechmachine that seems souless by comparison.

I think as said before, its all in the steering, (or maybe the weight) I do miss the x1/9's very direct steering. I also found the x1/9 suspension to be superior, firmer, more supportive of the chassis, I remember thinking the mr2 is very wallowy/squatty and the seating postion isn't as good as in the x1/9.

Spare wheel location was genius. Miss the sweaty torn up cream vinyl seats and having the doors fill up with water after having waxoyled them....Also miss the ice on the inside of the windscreen in winter and the everyday fear of not being able to get anywhere you want to go at every start up and the fear of not being able to get back home once you've got where you were going.... god damn little fiat nearly put me off car ownership forever....
crazylegs
Posts: 2811
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 4:13 pm
Location: Wiltshire

Re: X19 vs Mk1

Post by crazylegs »

oukie getting worried about your eyesight. :wink:
oukie
IMOC Organiser
Posts: 2474
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 7:34 pm
Location: Fife

Re: X19 vs Mk1

Post by oukie »

The point I was trying to make was , that I like them for the thought that had been put into certain aspects of the car , Ie spare wheel a frunk that you could put a whole suitcase in :shock: a good size boot fantastic, better than a t-bar roof etc

But I would never own one :mrgreen:

The fact that its a fiat puts me off firstly and the other small thing :lol:
Is that its an italian car built in the 70/80's :lol:
Mk1b White T-bar SC 1987, Mk1b White coupe Jan90, Mk1b White coupe Jan90 (spares), Mk1b Mica blue T-bar Mar90, Mk1b Mica blue T-bar,full climate control,Jan90, 5 mk1's :)
emrrtwo
Posts: 101
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 12:11 pm
Location: West Lothian, Scotland

Re: X19 vs Mk1

Post by emrrtwo »

Well it was between an x19, CRX and mk1 MR2 that the MR2 won when I was looking for my first mk1 many moons ago!. Have always had a soft spot for X19's though, saw these at a resent show I was at - the orange and white ones had some sort of turbo engine conversion but never got a good enough look in the engine bays to see exactly what. As you can probably tell from the pics I really liked the white one - love the colour scheme!

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image
Ben
Posts: 3074
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2008 9:49 pm
Location: Oxford(ish)
Contact:

Re: X19 vs Mk1

Post by Ben »

emrrtwo wrote:Image


Watch out Jo... it's El Tango :lol:
2001 BMW M5 (Bahnstormer) | 2004 RX8 231 (the Racecat) | 2001 Volvo V70 (Swedish eBay barge)

Previous:
1989 MR2 Mk1b T-bar | 1988 MR2 SC Super Edition
cartledge_uk
Posts: 7608
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 6:28 pm
Location: Newbury

Re: X19 vs Mk1

Post by cartledge_uk »

emrrtwo wrote:

Image




I believe it has a lancia delta integrale engine in the orange one (if its the one I think it is) :thumleft:
redmk1
Posts: 1352
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 5:53 pm

Re: X19 vs Mk1

Post by redmk1 »

Image

number plate says it all in my opinion.
Post Reply

Return to “MR2 MK1 1984-1989 NA & SC”